drew_half_empty
Looking for Real Life
Re: JTM45's might be the perfect single channel amps...
speakers have a lot to do with it, too
speakers have a lot to do with it, too
the guy who invented fire said:I am pretty picky about a clean tone...NO 50 (or less) watt amp has enough clean headroom if you are playing with buckers IMO...if I want a clean tone I want it to be clean...this is why I have a Fender Twin Reverb. As clean goes I guess a JTM-45 is ok but I would never buy one to use as a clean amp...that amp has one of the best crunch tones ever, and that's what I'd use it for!
newking70 said:what type of reverb are you using?
Gr8Scott said:What would an invader in a bright magogany and ebony strat sound like cranked in a JTM-45?
jdm61 said:some of the posts that I have read indicate that the typical guy who is looking to buy a JTM RI is not exactly thrilled with the newer effects loop models. With any of the JTM 45's you have to pretty selective about what speakers you use in a 4x12. You won't be able to drive your typical 75w speaker cones with any kind of authority, ergo, no cone breakup. This is an amp that was just made for a 2x12 closed back cab, but i would guess than any of the 15-30 watt Celestions or clones would do the trick in a 4x12. When I get mine, I'm palnning the stick with the Celestion Heritage 30 RI's that I have in my 18w. JTM's do not seem to have quite the power of the later 1987x 50w plexi. Not sure if it is tranny or the rectifier, since the two tranny JTM45/100 puts out 100 watts. The specs i have seen say that the 45 actually puts out more like somewhere in the 30's. Anybody know for sure?
Depends on the year, Bluesbreaker RI.the guy who invented fire said:For those of you who have owned a reissue JTM45:
I've been told by more than one guy that you can't put KT-66 in a reissue JTM-45 because the cabs are too small...is that true?