Red_Label
New member
Re: Just not diggin' my Bogner XTC Classic at this point...
Been through the dials, switches, etc many times over. Swapped-out tubes with whatever I could get my hands-on, including some of the most recommended combos for this particular model.
I dunno man, it just doesn't have that smooth, liquid Bogner thing that I think I'm looking for, so far. Now that I say that, I'm starting to wonder if I am looking more for the 101B's tone than the Classic. But I'm confused about that too. Because I've always heard that the Classic is more open-sounding. Which I think I prefer. I guess. I want articulation of individual notes. The older I get, the more I shy away from gain.
To give you an idea of how I ran my EL34 Shiva (and mostly liked), I ran the gain at noon. Rarely higher. I used a Fulltone OCD to hit the front end and give it some edge and roar. On that pedal, the gain was low (9:00) and the volumed was dimed. So it just added an edge there, but the notes remained articulate and clearly defined. I like that. So far, the XTC Classic seems "ratty", unsmooth, and just not refined to my ears. Now, if I turn the gain down to noon and hit it with the OCD, it sounds a bit like the Shiva did. Which is cool. But I was hoping to get similar tones from the XTC WITHOUT using the OCD.
Bottom line is, so far, anything I'm getting out of the XTC, I can get out of my Traynor just as well, if not better. That's the stickler. I just expect it to be a notch (or two) "better", more refined, more "juicy", whatever. That's why I am not yet satisfied.
Taking a break from playing tonight. Can't remember the last time I took a day off from playing. Might do me some good.
What tone are you expecting from the xtc? Where are you getting lost on the dials? Not enough gain? Too much mids? Need more smooth and fatness? Crank it (with an attenuator) or get different tubes. It's a loud amp that sounds good on low volumes but shines on gig/rehearsal levels.
The xtc by nature is a very 'piano clean' kind of amp with a ton of mids on board. I've found myself taming these high frequencies on my 101B and ended up with V30 speakers in a padded marshall cab and E34L power tubes for some more low mids. That was the ticket for me.
Been through the dials, switches, etc many times over. Swapped-out tubes with whatever I could get my hands-on, including some of the most recommended combos for this particular model.
I dunno man, it just doesn't have that smooth, liquid Bogner thing that I think I'm looking for, so far. Now that I say that, I'm starting to wonder if I am looking more for the 101B's tone than the Classic. But I'm confused about that too. Because I've always heard that the Classic is more open-sounding. Which I think I prefer. I guess. I want articulation of individual notes. The older I get, the more I shy away from gain.
To give you an idea of how I ran my EL34 Shiva (and mostly liked), I ran the gain at noon. Rarely higher. I used a Fulltone OCD to hit the front end and give it some edge and roar. On that pedal, the gain was low (9:00) and the volumed was dimed. So it just added an edge there, but the notes remained articulate and clearly defined. I like that. So far, the XTC Classic seems "ratty", unsmooth, and just not refined to my ears. Now, if I turn the gain down to noon and hit it with the OCD, it sounds a bit like the Shiva did. Which is cool. But I was hoping to get similar tones from the XTC WITHOUT using the OCD.
Bottom line is, so far, anything I'm getting out of the XTC, I can get out of my Traynor just as well, if not better. That's the stickler. I just expect it to be a notch (or two) "better", more refined, more "juicy", whatever. That's why I am not yet satisfied.
Taking a break from playing tonight. Can't remember the last time I took a day off from playing. Might do me some good.