I wish a couple people in this thread nothing but pestilence.
Ooooohhhh OOOoooooh Can i guess who?!
You said "Because the market says there is a need for it." Demand arises from both need and want, so you can't cast it is as representing only 'need'.
Why that's important is because guitar marketers will try to convince us that we should spend $2000 for that superior craftsmanship that can only be found ~~~***America***~~~ , we never had a need for it, we were talked into wanting it.
I think you are completely missing half of the price point. Of course a MIM or Korean made guitar can be sold for less money because the workers are paid less. If you want American made goods to cost close to or the same amount of money then American workers would have to work for less money. You are not just paying for a guitar when you buy an American guitar, you are paying for the American taxes on the company, the health insurance and safety insurance of the company, the employee salary and other costs of doing business in America. If Americans keep importing all their goods because they cost less there is nothing wrong with that decision at all but it comes with a price many do not see so clearly: the loss of jobs. Take a look at Detroit as a prime example.
Then there's no point of buying a Gibson cause you don't actually pay for stuff of better material, but compensate the company for the higher cost of doing business, no?
We never had any 'need'. We have the 'want'. You don't spend money on a Bentley cause of need, cause of want. Somebody from Maserati actually pointed it out blatantly. It's not the car you need, but the car you want.
Who the **** doesn't want to be associated with something of a high value? Anyone who doesn't give a **** about classy **** must be lying. Can't blame the marketers. It's just we humans have ego that need to be satiated.
I wish a couple people in this thread nothing but pestilence.
So brave
So imperious and better than everybody.
Anybody care to guess who the other one is?
So imperious and better than everybody.
What does this have to do with guitars?
That's what I have been trying to point out. Even if all the costs of doing business in the US have been factored in, as well as the grade AAA material put into the guitar, the end result just does not justify the thousands of dollars difference in price. I suppose the margin is the intrinsic value (pride, prestige, bragging right, personal satisfaction) that the manufacturer aims to sell to the market. Why else do you think people buy a Ferrari or a Bentley or a Rolex? It's the same thing as holding a Tom Anderson or a Suhr in front of your friends, even though an MIM Strat might do just as good, if 'tone' and 'guitar playing' are the only important factors.
The problem is, the golden ears who have been loyal members of this SUDGF for 10 ****ing years just can't stand people who question their intelligent sense (about tone), or just by having a 'differing' opinion. Ha!
That's why healthy conversation often gets twisted to personal attacks, infraction this, infraction that, warning this, warning that, pfft...
I am not surprised if there is an underground movement among members who share the same belief, whose mission is to attack and yank anyone who oppose their ideas.
Everybody's guitar-related experience is wrong because it's not inline with your own. Do you have some kind of disorder?
That's got to be it. You consistently act like my autistic son. Are you on the spectrum? That would explain a LOT, especially the inability to understand differing opinions.