Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

Securb

One of Jerry's Kids
I have a chance to buy a Mesa Boogie Mark III blue strip in great condition for a good price. I had a Mesa Boogie Studio Pre-amp that I loved and should have never sold, I am hoping for the same golden tone. Is there any downside or is this amp full of win like I think it is.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

Depends - do you want to use it as a 3 channel amp? I've heard of a lot of problems of people trying to balance the channels. It seems that if you use it as a 2 channel amp it would be much easier to use.

How much is the seller asking for it? I dunno what the Mesa market is like over there but they can go for 6-800 over here on a good day.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

I am a one channel guy so I would be fine with it. He was asking $1000 and I told him I could have a buddy ship one from the west coast for $800. That is when he said he has one other guy looking at it that he promised first swipe at the amp. So I am guessing I can get it for $800 if the other guy doesn't have a grand in his pocket.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

For 800 I would definitely hit that. I have never played a Mesa that left me disappointed.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

I'd grab it at that price. The only problem I've heard with those amps I'd the channel balancing issue... But they say that about my mkll also and I don't think it is really all that bad. I say go for it.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

I have three Mark IIIs. One is a 200-watt Coliseum head, 6x6L6 power, no stripe, EQ and Reverb. Then I have two combos: one red stripe and one blue; both are fully loaded with EQ, Reverb, Simul-Class. One has the EVM speaker; one has a Celestion G-100. The blue stripe has the Celestion, and also has the R2 Mod, allowing for a Master Volume on the R2 Channel. I use the combos with an additional 112 EVM Thiele cab underneath them. I have a couple of Mesa 412 Half-Back cabs and a 212 HB cab for the head.

The amps have five power configurations. There are 60-watt (2x6l6), 100-watt (4x6L6), and Simul-Class versions. These typically run with 2x6L6 in Class AB, or 2xEL34 (or 2x6L6) in Class A. There's a switch in the back for the 75-85 watt Simul-Class mode, or the Class A mode alone for 15-25 watts. (Most of the Mark IIIs run the Class A tubes in Triode; the later amps run Pentode for a little more power.) My Coliseum head is 6x6L6, and there is also a Simul-Class version of this head that they rate at 150 watts using 4x6L6 and then two tubes in Class A mode. The 100-watt and 200-watt versions do have Half-Power switches.

You may find some combos with a Black Shadow/Celestion C-90, or the Eminence/Black Shadow MS-12. The C-90 has that British snarl, the MS-12 is more like a JBL D or E-series with a smooth and sweet mid-range. The EVM is a monster, and probably the least "colored"--it puts out pretty much what you put into it.

Another nice feature is that some of the amps feature hardwood cabs and wicker grills. There were also vinyl options--my red stripe combo is in cream with a gold grill, and I have the matching Thiele cab for it. Beautiful rig, and actually more rare than the hardwood amps.

I love my Mark IIIs. I think they are great sounding amps. With the Thiele cab, I can certainly hang with any 100-watt stack; and while the amp is heavy, it is certainly more portable and has a smaller stage footprint--handy in small bars and clubs. Whether it's my G&L Legacys, Les Pauls, ES-335, Ibanez Artstar or Ghosrider, or my cheap-ass DanElectro 12-strings--every guitar sounds good through these amps. The controls have good sweeps, and they are sensitive. There are several pull-pots that can further help you tailor the tone. The Graphic follows the preamp, so you can dial in some bass without the amp being flubby. The V setting is renown for its great rock tone--I use a reverse V to add punch to my single coil guitars. They take pedals well.

My preference is for the fully loaded Reverb, EQ, Simul-Class, EVM versions, and these were the most expensive and generally are the most desirable. So the fully loaded version is where I would start price-wise, and then make deductions for no EQ, no Reverb, etc. I see fully-loaded Mark III combos with the hardwood cabs go for around $1,200 n my area; falling to around $600 for 60-watt, no EQ, no 'verb Plain Janes. Footswitches should be included.

Faults:

The footswitch situation is a bit messy--it uses three separate switches; LEAD/RHYTHM, RHYTHM 1/RHYTHM 2, and REV/EQ. They all use separate cables. There are some companies making all-in-one units with a cable snake. Mesa does sell replacements, but even finding used ones--they are expensive.

Not much control over the R2 Channel. The Gain is pre-set by the R1 Gain control. The R2 Mod is handy for controlling the over-all volume of this channel, and helps balance the three channels. The Mark IV has a little more control over R2. The Nomad has three channels with separate EQ and gain controls for each, but not the various power amp configurations. The Mark V does it all. The amps were hyped back then as having the "brown sound" from R2, but let's be clear--this amp is NOT a Marshall. You can get some great jazz tones from R2 by rolling down the guitar's volume--it has a warmer voicing than R1. But slam it with humbuckers and it will still sing and crunch.

Not the best reverb on the planet, but certainly usable. Probably not the amp to get if you're doing Dick Dale surf music. You'll need the REV/EQ foot switch to get the best of the reverb. There is a factory mod available.

Not the best EFX loop, and it is not switchable. Works pretty well with rack gear with buffered ins and outs. Some pedals work well, some don't.

Heavy. My Mark III with the EVM is probably 80 lbs. plus, and the one with the Celestion right behind it.

Mesas are made with non-adjustable fixed bias. Now, that's not a fault--to me, it is a BIG asset, because as long as I use Mesa's tubes, I don't have to pay to have the amp re-biased each time I change tubes. That actually saves the user a LOT of dough over the life of the amp. Where it can be a problem is when some yahoo decides to be "smarter" than the amp's designer and has the amp modded for bias pots. And then you get some out of spec tubes in it, and then it can cause problems down the line. Helps to know if the amp is stock or been modified before you buy.

There are probably better amps for Nordic Death Metal. These amps were state-of-the art, but they are from the '80s. But for jazz, blues, country, classic rock--great all around amps. Use accordingly.

Again, not a fault per se, but these combos are high-powered .44 cal derringers--lots of power in a small package. You must keep high quality, low noise and non-microphonic tubes in them.

The combos are good, but adding the 112 Thiele makes them come alive. The Thiele add a lot of low-end punch and projection, and sets the combo up at a good level to see and adjust the controls. I like the combination of the open-back combo and the closed bottom--better than either alone. For me--it's just perfect for the gigs I do.

So that's about all I know on the Mark III. I STRONGLY recommend that you download and read the Mark III's Owner's Manual from the Mesa website. The Boogie Board forum at grailtone.com is a great resource, and if you have any questions, the guys at Mesa are happy to help. Call them!

Good luck!

Bill
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

Nice. I didn't say it WOULDN'T do metal, but some guys have other preferences for metal amps. :)

Bill
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

You can get tone very similar to a Studio Preamp from a Mark III using the Lead and Rhythm 1 channels. I didn't really care for R2, so I essentially ignored it. Bill pretty much said it all, the only thing I have to add is that the class A tubes (in Simul-class amps) were changed to pentode for the green stripe version. If the blue stripe you're looking at is very late in the production run, it is possible that they'll be pentode as well but unlikely.

Personally I'd only be interested in a Mark III with Simul-class, Reverb, and EQ. Of these features the EQ is most important as the tonal palette is much more limited without it. I like Simul-class because it changes the feel of the amp for the better IMO. Reverb is least important as it is absolutely usable, but nowhere near as good as a Fender Twin or Deluxe.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

I am still waiting on the guy's call. I am going to pull the trigger I have the cash - in cash sitting around the house. Plus I have had a pretty good sales year and plan on thinning the gear heard a bit after this. Should I go as high as a grand if need be?
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

I am still waiting on the guy's call. I am going to pull the trigger I have the cash - in cash sitting around the house. Plus I have had a pretty good sales year and plan on thinning the gear heard a bit after this. Should I go as high as a grand if need be?

Unless the amp is fully loaded Simul / EQ / Rev / EV, I'd pass. You can do better elsewhere if you want a Mark III that badly.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

Mine is also an early no-stripe, and it's the non-simul 60/100. I've heard the simul amps, and I don't feel like I'm missing all that much for how I use it. It will definitely do metal, and nearly any other style of music you could want to play. They're really tight amps, and really aggressive with the midrange on the lead channel, which I like. I run it with both the lead and R2 on for extra mush, then hit it with the OD to tighten it back up, sounds great. To me the R2 mod is a must. You can set up the R1/R2 for a more Fendery thing and set the EQ to auto on with the lead channel and override the rhythm settings a little bit, but mostly you'll find that you either "sacrifice" a bit to get all three channels useable, or you just end up liking the darker rhythm sounds because the lead channel is **** then, which is how I roll.

I love it. I've thought about moving on from it a couple times because it makes me nervous (runs hot, noisey on the lead channel), but then I crank it and nothing compares. The 427 Cobra comparison is probably apt.

I've seen them go loaded for $750, but not recently, so I dunno. I wouldn't let mine go for less than 9 bills. If you get it, def download the manual, you can't just go knob turning and get a good sound, extreme setting are baaaaaaaad news.
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

I actually decided that I'm probably going to sell my blue stripe Mark III combo, with the Celestion 100, EQ, REV, R2 mod, Simul-Class, two footswitches and the vinyl cover. It's loaded with all EH 12Ax7s and Winged C/SED tubes (2x6L6 and 2xEL34). The black cab is excellent condition, and I have a matching 112 Thiele cab with a humongous JBL E-120 (though this cab does have some nicks). I have a cover for this piece too. It is a wonderful rig and the bark and snarl of the C-100 with the deep bass, creamy mids and smooth highs of the JBL make for a really sweet mini stack. I like these two speakers together much better than either alone. I've not giggged this amp since I bought it in 2007. I expect to be using the Mark V for my regular gigging amp for the future. And I'm getting older; it just might be time to let some of these pieces go; and this amp is redundant for me.

Now, to give you an idea, I will probably ask for $1,400 for the set. I might not get that the day after I put it up, but that's what it's worth. And compared to what some people are spending on some of the junky stuff being sold these days (I won't mention any names), this is a great amp--one that will last a player a lifetime.

That said, if you are going to be looking at $1,000+ for an amp, you have some other options. I've seen Lonestars, Electra-Dynes, Nomads, Recto-Verbs, Stilettos, Trem-O-Verbs and Mavericks all around that price range. There's an older Mark IV that popped up on the Seattle CL for less than a Grand--a really low price for a 1V--and I'd be on that if I wasn't already set for amps.

I think the Mark III can hold its own against ANY of those amps. It has a certain simplicity that makes it wonderful as a gigging amp, yet it is a terrific amp to use in the studio too. It is so versatile--you can just dial in so many different tones, and they're always usable. The other amps have different personalities to fit varying styles, but the Mark III will always be one of my favorites.

I hope this helps. Good luck!

Bill
 
Re: Mark III Blue Stripe - Pros vs Cons?

Go for it. I never should have sold mine. Luckily, it was to a friend,so I might be able to buy it back some day. But in the meantime, I miss that amp like mad!
 
Back
Top