Gearjoneser said:I never valued the idea of phase switches, or any other tricky mini-toggles all over the front of a guitar. Those seem like switches that get used on the first day you own the guitar, then never get touched again.
dr.barlo said:Lew, so you don't like Peter Green huh? :cussing:
B :firedevil
:lmao:
I´m with Jonesy. All those funky bells, whistles, grenade launchers, and railguns on a Carvin or an old BC Rich are fun, sure, but I´d say most people find about 5 tones they like and stick with those.Gearjoneser said:I never valued the idea of phase switches, or any other tricky mini-toggles all over the front of a guitar. Those seem like switches that get used on the first day you own the guitar, then never get touched again.
I can see what you're getting at - some like to control, like you explained, simply by picking hand attack and volume control and/or the amplifier's EQ, pedals, etc.the_Chris said:People may disagree with me on this, but I never found the tone control on my guitars very useful. I always used my volume knob or pick attack to control my tone. I'd just as soon screw the tone control, make my volume split my humbuckers and say it's over with.
The Bardens I'm looking at actually use the tone control to fatten up the sound without getting muddy. So after I get one, I may be thinking twice about tone controls. However, for my guitars, it just never worked out right (half the tone control movement made no difference and then all of a sudden I'd get this nasty, muddy tone).
Oh gosh...just about everything I disagree with!! Tone controls, coil splitting, bridge/neck selector, AH! :smack: I guess that's diversity for ya!DeadSkinSlayer3 said:Scalloping somewhat, tone controls, coil splitting period, middle switch positions, neck pickup for rythm with distortion.