Where in the specs did it specifiy it being a 220x derivitive? Or was that pure speculation on someone's part based purely on the 100W AFD amp?
Now that you mention it, I´m not too sure where I picked that up either, I think it was the other thread a few days ago....
The ad copy from Marshall states that it is based on the AFD100 amp. I cannot post links or I would. Its in the other thread, on the guitarhangar link(which is the marshall ad copy posted to their webpage for the amp)
I saw that and the ad copy reads: "Working closely with Slash after the success of the AFD100, it was deemed appropriate to make a more accessible amplifier that is ideal for home or studio use."
That's the only mention of the AFD100. It doesn't say it is based off of it.
It says it is designed to get the tone of that album.nail it, in fact.
Albums was a modded 2203, right? AFD100 is a modded 22xx? This SL5 is based on getting the tone those amps produce, right? Its inferred by the ad copy,but does not state it flat out, yes.
That said, I never stated it was supposed to be a 2203. I simply asked whether it was a 1959 or a 2203. And my comment above was "not very 800ish". Which it is not.
They didn't call it the AFD-5 for a reason. It'll get good tones, it may be a great amp, but its no AFD 100