No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

...if you can't get a good sound from most of the modeling products available today you need to try harder.

I don't doubt that this is true. And there's the rub - with a modeler you need to try harder.

I have several tube amps and also a few modelers in either hybrid or pedalboard form. With a modeler, I am always tweaking things, flipping switches and trying to decide whether I want to use the "American 4x12" or the "Brittish 4x12" cabinet. And (maybe because I don't run my modelers through a very loud amp) I have yet to experience the same touch response that I get out of any tube amp.

I could spend a few thousand $$$ to get the best damn modeler on the market, just to hope that it would live up to 1/3 the fun I have plugging into my cheap old Blues Jr. and turning up one knob labeled "Volume." I think it's partly the no-nonsense interface to most tube amps - maybe a half a dozen tone/gain knobs to tweak and you're done, where most modelers make you run through a ton of menu settings, and many do not have a good volume balance between different models. If my tone isn't quite right on a tube amp, I slightly tweak a knob or two and everything gets incrementally better. On a modeler, hit the wrong button and you just switched to a completely different sound that may or may not cut through the band mix.

I am not the kind of player who loses sleep over reproducing the tone of other players. I only aspire to play the right notes with the right feel, and I expect my own sound to contribute to making the song my own. If I were the type to fret over what kind of grill cloth Slash used on his stack in Appetite for Destruction, I might be more into buying what modelers are selling.

I know that I play better without the distraction of a modeler. I think it puts me in a place where I don't expect the magic in the amp to do all the work for me - I have to bring the tone myself and/or work with what I can get out of a few knobs. If that makes me some kind of "Tone Snob" then so be it.
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

Well if modelling amps were good enough for Jimi Hendrix, Jimmy Page and Van Halen, I don't see any problem with using them :scratchch
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

I'm done with tubes. I don't need the variability in sound due to wear, line voltage, humidity, etc. I can't often play loud enough to get a tube amp into "the zone" where it gives up the sonic goods. I don't enjoy tap dancing on pedalboards. I get that these tools don't work for everyone. That's fine, because they're just tools. Some people invest too much of their egos into their gear.

For those who don't think modelers can get crunchy, I rather like the Voxy crunch in this track.

 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

Alex tone pre Permanent Waves = awesome. Post Hemispheres he started really juicing up his tone...I understand why..
he was all about filling in sonic gaps in a three piece, and not just being a lead guitar player in a power trio... But his tone did become way to wet for me as well.


His HKs sound grea today.., but he still uses all kinds of effects. And yes they are tube amps..his sig model and that switchblade or coreblade or whatever. He just does not use mic'ed cabs anymore.
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

I'm personally hanging out for a full tube amp that models digital modelling amps. Something that features a rotary dial selecting from an array of vintage classics such as Line6, Boss, Roland, Johnson, Digitech, Behringer, and Zoom. Loaded with illustrious holy grail presets "guitar center kid noodling", "lost in the mix" and "nu-metal fizz". All the inconvenience of owning a tube amp complete with the TO DIE FOR digital tone of the late '90s/early '2000s.
 
Last edited:
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

I love tube amps but may be forced to get away from them a bit but we'll see. I may just downgrade wattage for apartment living. Either way, my ears have only known tubes for the past 6 years of my playing now. I love them for guitar. Bass? Now that's another story, I like GK. So I'm only a tube snob with guitars.

I don't hate modeling, it does have a very noticeable digital presence to it, especially to a dynamics player looking to get authentic break-up. Or to the "sweet-spot" headroom seekers. Sure, tubes are cranky and unpredictable...but they're emotions really can be rewarding when coaxed just right. Maybe need to play or check out modeling again, but tubes just feel and sound right to me. It's as if they live and breathe, an organic experience where notes jump off the neck and expression is chased with seduction.
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

You need to go out more, Christian.

Or maybe change venues, where better performers are exhibited? :wave:

No...no, I don't. I don't see how you can say that.

It's funny, you started this thread and made it sound as though you wanted other folks opinions on modeling amps/gear. I gave you my opinion and you made a statement implying you feel like I am wrong.

Strange...you didn't tell anybody else they were wrong.
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

I'm personally hanging out for a full tube amp that models digital modelling amps. Something that features a rotary dial selecting from an array of vintage classics such as Line6, Boss, Roland, Johnson, Digitech, Behringer, and Zoom. Loaded with illustrious holy grail presets "guitar center kid noodling", "lost in the mix" and "nu-metal fizz". All the inconvenience of owning a tube amp complete with the TO DIE FOR digital tone of the late '90s/early '2000s.


:nominatesforvault:
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

In 2005 I bought a Behringer V-Ampire 112, together with its footcontroller, the FCB-1010.

After that, a Johnson J-Station, a V-Amp 3, a Mustang Floor and since may 2011, I'm gigging/recording/rehearsing with a three-year old laptop w/WinXP, a Tascam US-122 MK-II Audio/MIDI card, and a couple of Behringer B210Ds. I also own a Roland GR-55 guitar synth, which I haven't yet used in a gigging/recording project.

Since then, I've made in excess of 1,300 gigs, about 120 recording projects and several thousand rehearsals/jams, always using some kind of modeler.

For the record, I DO own a Custom-made, 30W P2P all-tube amp, with a BF clean channel, a Plexi crunch channel and a SLO lead channel, based on an AC30/Trainwreck output stage with a Celestion G12-65 speaker. It makes a happy home for the spider family living there, which gladly take care for me of the mosquito issue in the summer.

Care to share some recording/gigging/jamming anecdote involving modelers?
 
Last edited:
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

^ I used to jam with a Vox ToneLab as a front-end, run into the effects return (100% mix) on a Marshall TSL100 half stack. What I found was that, at volume, the ToneLab sounded better than the preamp section of the TSL. Granted, that's everyone's least favorite tube Marshall, but since I'll be looking for an amp in the near future, it's a good reminder that specs and lore and posturing don't matter. What works is what matters.
 
Last edited:
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

No...no, I don't. I don't see how you can say that.

It's funny, you started this thread and made it sound as though you wanted other folks opinions on modeling amps/gear. I gave you my opinion and you made a statement implying you feel like I am wrong.

Strange...you didn't tell anybody else they were wrong.

Christian: where do I state something about being "wrong"? It's all about the fact that you "yet" have to see a performer sounding good with a modeler.

If you haven't, what's so wrong with that? Nothing.

However, I, *in jest*, stated as you not seeing a lot of performers (you need to go out more, Christian) or looking in the venues with a low level of musicianship (Or maybe change venues, where better performers are exhibited?), which depending on the area you live in, you may or may not have the possibility. Plus, the :wave: emoticon?

Peace...! :wave:
 
Last edited:
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

I've always liked my Vox Valvetronix amps. I had a Blue face AD60VTX for years, and it was probably the best sounding modeler I've owned. I still have a metal grill AD15vt for practice. I don't think the newer VT+ models are a step up, tone-wise, but they are more versatile. I'd really like to play one of the new Valvetronix Pro VTX150 to see if the tone was an improvement over the old blue face models.

What they are is convenient. There comes a time when you have spent too many hours dealing with pedal chains, tube swapping, bad tubes, blown fuses, back-breaking weight and ear-splitting volume that makes the modelers seem MUCH more attractive. They are great if you only have a few minutes to switch on and play. You have all your amps, pedals, reverb, and a tuner there at your fingertips with one flip of the switch.

I also think they are what most new players should begin with. They teach you a lot about amps and effects, and can sound good at very low volumes. You can get a feel for which amp models are useful for you, which effects you would and would not use, what type of reverb and delay you use most, and it gives you a wide pallet of amp tones to play with. The built-in tuner is handy too, if you are playing lower cost guitars. If you are simply a chugga-chugga thrash metal player, then you might be OK with a tube amp that does that one thing well, but if you appreciate music from a wide area of genres from blues to surf to rockabilly, to psychedelic, to classic rock, to early metal, to hair bands, to grunge, to nu metal to today's whatever, then there is no way you can cover that ground with one tube amp, when you are starting out.
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

... since may 2010 ... I've made in excess of 1,300 gigs ... and several thousand rehearsals/jams

Not questioning anyone's work schedule - I'm just noticing that's about 8-9 gigs a week with no days off for 3 years. Well done!
(My schedule only gets like that when I play in churches. :knockedou )

Care to share some recording/gigging/jamming anecdote involving modelers?

I noted my usage of modeling amps earlier in the thread. I use them for cover band gigs because of the need to match a variety of sounds/tones rapidly from song to song, and because the music at those gigs typically isn't as important to the audience as their own socializing. The #1 issue from that experience is that I have to tweak the settings of modelers more from venue to venue, more than I do with real amps. I don't have a good explanation for that, other than perhaps the lack of punch I get from modelers requires more drastic EQ/level tweaks?
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

I'm done with tubes. I don't need the variability in sound due to wear, line voltage, humidity, etc. I can't often play loud enough to get a tube amp into "the zone" where it gives up the sonic goods. I don't enjoy tap dancing on pedalboards. I get that these tools don't work for everyone. That's fine, because they're just tools. Some people invest too much of their egos into their gear.

For those who don't think modelers can get crunchy, I rather like the Voxy crunch in this track.


I could tell that was a modeller with my head in a bucket of cement. The lead sounds lack any kind of dynamics.
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

Not questioning anyone's work schedule - I'm just noticing that's about 8-9 gigs a week with no days off for 3 years.

It was a typo, which I corrected later... it was may 2011. Hey, I'm no rock star, mind you! ;)
 
Re: No love for modeling 'round here, uh?

Yeah, I was a doorman/bouncer at a busy sports bar that had bands every friday and Saturday nights. I worked there for 7 years with 40 nights or so of bands for 7 years is 280 performances.

Almost every gigging rock and roll cover band and some not so cover band from the Charlotte area came in through there at one time or another.

I noticed that some of the best sounding guitarists had modelers and were using Line 6 stuff ('98-2005)... the only better tone guys were the guys with killer chops who brought little vintage tube combo amps on amp stands. They would have sounded fantastic with modelers though. I stood in the same spot for 7 years and the consistently pro sounding guys used PODs or Flextones. The guys with modelers had decent stage volumes too... not too loud and allowed the whole band to breathe and not sound as distorted as the other often bands did.

Just my observations... tube amps are where it's at, but to record a tube amp with microphones is a whole different ball game than just owning one and plugging into it. I don't think 90% of guitar players are up to recording decent amplifier tones with microphones.
 
Back
Top