I guess it depends on the P90 too. I'm sure the Custom P90 or the Hot P90 don't sound much like the Antiquities.
I'm not going to contradict anyone, though. I've played standard P90's in the past, but the real hands-on experiences I have with P90's are either Phat Cats or P Rails, neither of which sound dead-on the same, nor are "true" P90's.
I'd say the the QP Tele Bridge is hotter than either, though.
I think they're not quite P90. I can hear the P90-ish characteristics loosely, but stereotypical P90's are kinda sorta PAF-ish. And IME, at least the bridge Tele QP is pretty mid-forward.
For me, I would describe it as a blend of JB gone single coil, maybe a bit P90, maybe a bit of Tele bridge pickup. Depends on what Tele you put it in as well. Mine is super thin and wiry acoustically (pine body and maple fretboard), so it does keep a lot of that Tele twang in there while beefing it up significantly and losing that ugly single coil scratchiness under gain.
P-90 with a standard bobin size and housing? I don't know. I'm not a P90 expert. That's why I mentioned that was my limited experience with P90's and that I'm not going to go ahead and say everyone's statement is wrong. Just that my experience does not agree with everyone else's. But I'm admiting my experience is very narrow.What do you mean by not "true" P-90s?
That was exactly my point, LOL. A JB doesn't resemble a P90. The QP (loosely) resembles a JB to me in that it's middy and slightly dark relative to, say, a standard Tele vs. a QP or a PAF or vintage-y P90 vs. a JB.How could you even mention JB and P-90 in the same sentence?!
I also mentioned somewhere else in this thread that P-90 could mean a lot of things. I'm paraphrasing, but something like that. I'm sure there are a P90 or two out there that sound like the QP Tele. What I was trying to say was that the QP Tele to me doesn't sound like the P-Rails or the Phat Cat.the P-90 (with its 2 magnets) offers a lot of flexibility in tone.