Question for Duncan the company

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Funny how many here seem to take this question like it was a personal attack on them and they must answer for SD themselves. Nothing wrong with being curious why not and SD sure doesnt need anyone on this forum to defend them.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Funny how many here seem to take this question like it was a personal attack on them and they must answer for SD themselves. Nothing wrong with being curious why not and SD sure doesnt need anyone on this forum to defend them.

Well SD isn't going to say why obviously, so coming up with our own possible reasons is the best anyone can do.

Someone pointed out they have like 10 PAF models, that's a lot of product to give away. Do they return the pickups typically? If not, I'd ask SD for ten Zephyrs for a "product consistency" shootout I intend to publish.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Back in the Nineties, one of the major American guitar magazines did a similar pickup shoot-out and invited representatives of the manufacturers to participate in a debate. That time around, Larry DiMarzio elected not to take part. He also elected not to issue any sort of explanation as to why. In subsequent issues of that title, letters were published asking questions such as, "why no Larry?" and' "what's he got to hide?"

Plus ça change, plus c'est les memes choses.

Hey he trademarked the term "PAF", so his must be the very best, no?

His lawyer, that is.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

My point was that this sort of thing has happened before and that it didn't matter squat either time around.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Well SD isn't going to say why obviously, so coming up with our own possible reasons is the best anyone can do.

Someone pointed out they have like 10 PAF models, that's a lot of product to give away. Do they return the pickups typically? If not, I'd ask SD for ten Zephyrs for a "product consistency" shootout I intend to publish.

Many times its much better to not speculate...

Even then you missed my point. SD doesnt need anyone here to defend them.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Many times its much better to not speculate...

Even then you missed my point. SD doesnt need anyone here to defend them.

A) What's the harm in speculating? It's fun. They've been speculating about what happened to the missing airplane for weeks, but nobodies for sure, and we might never know, just like in this case.

B) You're assertion that we're defending SD implies you have knowledge about what our motivations are. You do not.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

If SD doesn't need anyone here to defend them, they also have no need to put up their dukes in a fight to the death of the ultimate PAF.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

IMO it's just a pretext for observing other things, like the various PAF product lines offered, and the credibility of trade rags in general.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

No print magazine for anything goes out acquiring their own samples.

I did for a magazine once. Tough work but someone's gotta do it. "Hey honey, I've just gotta dip into the joint account and buy some pickups for an article. It's a work thing. Yes it's deductible."
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Often the "shootouts" in those rags are based on money changing hands. I can't believe you even read that ****. I gave you more credit than that. Good on Duncan for not participating in the game.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Wow...you guys are amazing.

First, maybe I used the wrong word when I called it a "shootout"...it's more like a review, done in a controlled test set up of 9 sets of PAF style pickups...let's call it a round up.

No winners, no loosers.

As for the fact that it's in a printed, paper magazine if I said I read an article on my iPhone, iPad, laptop, desk top, Android, Google phone, etc would it be more or less of an article?! I get it, it's 2014 and print media is dead but does that mean that if it's in print it no longer counts?! If you believer that then read the article on GP's website on using the GP app...same article.

On the subject of money changing hands for positive reviews, I am no dummy, I know things like that happen but I find it offensive that any of you guys, without any proof at all would simply jump on that wagon and claim that SD declined to send in pickups for review simply because the roundup might be bought and paid for.

The stance I see here about "no need for the leader of the pack to participate" or whatever stop being fan boys and look around.

Seymour Duncan was the leader of the pack in the 70's and 80's but now it's a much bigger pack and there are lots and lots...and lots of PAF clones out there and many of them are more accurate in more ways then one than anything Duncan sells so I'd think they want to jump in to the mix and show folks why they are still a force in the pickup world and with PAF's in particular.

As for if the companies gave or sold or loaned their pickups to the magazine I don't have that answer and I'm betting that none of you guys do either so I see that as a non issue and at the end of the day what's it going to cost SD?? one set of pickups...drop in the bucket to show a bunch of readers their pickups.

I just feel like Duncan offers several flavors of killer PAF style pickups and was just sort of surprised when I didn't see a Duncan pickups in the roundup...I was shocked when they mentioned in the roundup that they wanted to include a Duncan pickup set but Duncan didn't want to be involved.

No need for anybody to flip out, wonder why I read paper magazines, question GP's integrity or any of the other nonsense in this thread to be honest...it's a good issue overall that really focuses on pickups in general and the strange thing is that Seymour Duncan is just a small blip in the entire magazine only being mentioned in one article and only they to say that they declined to send a set of pickups for the PAF roundup...

Just a strange thing to me and I was curious as to why and while I am doubtful Duncan can or will say why, I was sort of hoping that they might.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Maybe it's because of their appearance in another " Guitar Magazine "

- http://www.premierguitar.com/articl...ces-the-jason-becker-perpetual-burn-humbucker -

Mar14_LNU_SeymourDuncan_JasonBecker_WEB.jpg
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

I think this was a totally legit question.

I also think there are a ton of totally legit answers.

I'd like to hear them. I'll sleep at night even fig I don't.

No hate on GP. I find it fairly, but not totally, respectable. I can usually read/see bias, and make my own decisions. And then there is the intarweb for confirmation/denial. But a BLIND listening test is the only way to do this really.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Fanboys attack.jpg

FWIW I like hard magazines, books, CDs, and even records! I like something tangible.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Hey, I'm pretty much just givin' ya grief, man. I didn't mean it seriously, so please don't take it that way.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Interesting to me that ThroBak was included in this. I thought I had read the guy from Throbak say he never gave pickups to these kinds of things on another forum.
 
Re: Question for Duncan the company

Why Duncan did not participate is their choice, and I don't think they need to ans that to anyone. That said If I see a an article on Pickups I would expect to see Duncan ( as well as Dimarzio, EMG) mentioned in them.

On a very personnel note, If I want to know anything about any pickup, by any manufacturer I would ask that question here on the forum. And get good reviews from diff people, rather than a most likely biased review , for whatever reason from an article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top