Great response. I totally agree. The '57's are decent pups but the Seths have more character and are definitely warmer and more articulate. My guess is that when the '57's age they'll sound better.
P.S. I''m going to try to burn your CD's this weekend. Sorry for the delay :blackeye:
I've only owned the Gibson '57 classic but from all the clips I've heard I can safely say the Seth lover sounds like a more warm pickup and would be great for the neck position of your telecaster.
Rock On :smoker:
I would say it is. I use one in my Hamer Monoco Super Pro. The Seth is warmer and less trebley than a Duncan Jazz N or 59N. But it also has less bass than those two pickups so even though the Seth is warm and full sounding, it's still clearer when I crank up the volume on my amps because it has less bass. It's the bass frequencies that contribute to a muddy or wooly tone.
Here's a good shoortout that gets specific about differences in tone between the the Seth Lover and 57 Classic. httP;/www.legendarytones.com
Some ears, BTW, find the '57 Classic to be a bright and somewhat metallic sounding pickup. Depends on the guitar and the player I think.
Hey Lew, in my alder bodied strat with a maple/maple neck, pick-up screwed right to the body, the pickup is pretty bright. But I'm not complaining, the pickup is staying in there, but I would say it's quite a bit more bright than any clips i've ever heard of a seth lover pickup.
ROck On :13: