SD Vintage P90, Antiq P90, & SD Staple P90??

zozoe

New member
What are the major tonal differences between these? My playing goes from clean to not too heavy OD in my Mesa DC3 amp? Looking to do a 2 pup, 2 vol, 1 tone in a Strat. Is the Staple overkill, and which pup might best emulate that 1959 LP Special sound? Alnico 2 or 5? Thanks all~
 
Re: SD Vintage P90, Antiq P90, & SD Staple P90??

Both the vintage and ant are looking at the same tone. The ant just has a few tricks up its sleeves to make it a bit more vintage mellow.
The staple is a whole different tone. More like a fat strat. The 1954 Las Paul custom had one in the neck and a p90 in the bridge
 
Re: SD Vintage P90, Antiq P90, & SD Staple P90??

What Alex said, since the staple has a different construction you need a deeper routing in your guitar. Stay with the Vintage P90 since the Ants use degaussed magnets, which gives a very mellow feeling for modern players. I paired a 1953 original P90 neck with a Ant bridge. I ended up to swap the degaussed mags to beefier tone
The Vintage is a perfect copy of mid to end 50ies P90. Even the coil hookup are both blacks also the grommet rubber is black. Everything to a T the same.
 
Last edited:
Re: SD Vintage P90, Antiq P90, & SD Staple P90??

The Vintage P90 is wax potted, too, which may be a factor for you. Pickups without wax potting seem to have a little more touch-sensitivity, at the expense of some squealing at high gain/high volume situations.
 
Re: SD Vintage P90, Antiq P90, & SD Staple P90??

Staples are great in the neck slot, a little bright & thin in the bridge for some (most?) players. The individual magnets are height adjustable, which makes them very tall, you need a deep slot, and sometimes wood has to be removed to fit them in.

A great set would be a Vintage P-90 in the bridge and either a Staple or Vintage P-90 in the neck slot.
 
Back
Top