theodie said:I bought Artie's if I remember correctly. I didnt personally like it. On paper it sounded like a great idea but, I found it to be a bit stale sounding! Lack luster at best in my opinion.
BTW, I tried it in a 1974 Ibanez Les Paul copy in the neck position!
Got ya, I had it and someone made me the right offer for it a while back so I unloaded it, I mean sold it LOL!!!!!! . Sorry about that bro!ArtieToo said:So . . . you're the one I unloaded . . . er, I mean, sold that to.![]()
Remember . . . that sale was "satisfaction gauranteed". I'd be happy to take it back. I thought it might be cool to physically split one into two separate singles. Just to see how it worked.
Artie
ArtieToo said:It struck me as being very similar to an SSL-1, which is odd because the SSL-1 uses A5 mags and the SM uses A2. Could be the close proximity of the other "set" gives it A5 power.
sufferinrewind said:... Maybe Seymour should think about putting a third dummy coil to create hum cancelation when in split coil mode. Just a possibility...
tone4days said:of course, for us goofballs who hear a difference between the two coils (and would thus use an on-off-on minitoggle to be able to select EITHER coil), he'd need two dummy coils
cheers
t4d (goofball emeritus)
![]()