The Mighty Parallel Axis

I don't doubt that you are the only one, since they are obviously designed for trem equipped guitars. I like you thought the same for awhile. However, I actually have quite a few hardtail guitars that have wider spacing, and a typical spaced pickup didn't align with the strings. I have used F spaced pickups in them to help align the poles with great success. The first time I did this was kind of an experiment, but it worked out well, so now when I swap pickups on a hardtail guitar I measure the string spacing before ordering a pickup (if I am not sure of that spacing).

Cole
 
I have this idea that they are only for guitars with Floyds, and that has probably influenced why I am unfamiliar with them. If that was how I feel, I'd imagine I am not the only one.

Definitely not the only one. They were advertised this way for a long time during the heyday of the Floyded Super-Strat and then never spoken about again.

I stand by the others here...the PA series are some of the best pickups SD makes, hands down. Definitely not *just* for super-strats, not by a long shot.

I'm extremely glad to see a resurgence in interest in these pickups. They were ahead of their time, if you ask me!
 
Here's my Ibanez RG870RWZ with a PATB-1 set and a PA-STK1. Absolutely awesome set, beat the stock DiMarzio/Ibz by miles. Also had a PATB-2/1 ser on BC Rich Warlock NJ Neck-Thru series a few years back, and it was an Ideal eet for all kinds of Metal

That is awesome. That's exactly what I was thinking of doing. Parallel Axis in an HSH configuration. That thing has got to be killer.

You also inspired me to know what to do with my PATB-1n/PATB-3b set. I also have the MIJ Warlock NJ. Lots of holes for switches and knobs. :headbang:

Warlock-02b.JPG
 
Most of the new Gibson guitars work better with wider spaces pickups. I k ow my 2001 and 2005 Les Pauls line up better with 53mm spaces pickups.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Any Gibson with a "T" series bridge pickup (490T, 498T, 500T, etc) is a perfect candidate for a "Trem"-spaced pickup :)
 
Definitely not the only one. They were advertised this way for a long time during the heyday of the Floyded Super-Strat and then never spoken about again.

I stand by the others here...the PA series are some of the best pickups SD makes, hands down. Definitely not *just* for super-strats, not by a long shot.

I'm extremely glad to see a resurgence in interest in these pickups. They were ahead of their time, if you ask me!

I think they are due for a new ad campaign that states this. What advantages do these poles have on a non-Floyd guitar? Do they do something to the magnetic field? Are these pole integral to the unique sound of these pickups?
 
Yeah, obviously I have this idea that they are only for guitars with Floyds, and that has probably influenced why I am unfamiliar with them. If that was how I feel, I'd imagine I am not the only one.

The 3 was certainly advertised around making a Floyded superstrat sound more like a Les Paul (Blues Saraceno model)
But I don't believe the others were quite so specifically targeted.
 
The 3 was certainly advertised around making a Floyded superstrat sound more like a Les Paul (Blues Saraceno model)
But I don't believe the others were quite so specifically targeted.

Maybe the 3 is the one I remember being marketed that way. Does anyone remember why the poles were designed that way? I always thought it was to 'hear' wildly vibrating strings when divebombing.
 
3BYX12W.jpg


These will be going into my Charvel Model 2 project, hopefully next spring / summer.
 
Not sure about a black winter version, but the originals sounds pretty damn good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Does anyone remember why the poles were designed that way?

Somewhere, in the deep catacombs of my memory, I seem to recall a Seymour Q&A where he said they were designed that way because that was his take on how a pole piece should be designed. I can't elaborate.
 
Somewhere, in the deep catacombs of my memory, I seem to recall a Seymour Q&A where he said they were designed that way because that was his take on how a pole piece should be designed. I can't elaborate.

Huh, interesting. I will have to ask about it sometime.
 
I believe that the idea was to surround the string with the magnetic field. The tag line in the adds was “Get your Es back.” They are definitely a unique design. Very recognizable in a guitar.
 
Maybe the 3 is the one I remember being marketed that way. Does anyone remember why the poles were designed that way? I always thought it was to 'hear' wildly vibrating strings when divebombing.

IIRC, it was to reduce string pull, as well as produce a more even magnetic field. Same idea as a Precision Bass pickup, but tweaked for guitar. Coil geometry (the coil shape changed because of the outer polepieces resulting in a more rectangular pickup shape than most other pickups).

It has some benefits for divebombing, but it has them in general, too.

It's really frustrating that guitarists are so reactionary, they sound amazing, and are ridiculously fun to play, ridiculously responsive to pick articulation and volume/tone adjustments at the guitar. It'd be nice if there were a wider variety of them, as A5 hot '59, higher output Custom 5, and gonzo metal growlier Distortion aren't what everyone is looking for.

PATB-1b is pretty similar to a Custom 5, only with a bit hotter output and harmonics that make it as fun for soloing as a JB.

PATB-3b is like a brobucker that didn't lose the high end when overwound.

I'd love to see a Parallel Axis Sentient, for another neck pickup option. Debating just going with the standard Sentient, but there's a number of good arguments for a Parallel Axis in the neck (particularly reduced string pull and thick lower mids without farting out).
 
Back
Top