PFDarkside
of the Forum
Re: True Bypass .... fact or fiction ?
In the end, there’s no right or wrong, just preferences. Know how it all works so you can choose what works best for your situation.
Yes, exactly. True Bypass is far better than that. I also prefer Phaser and Flanger in front of the amp as well. I guess it’s the sound of the albums I grew up listening to.The problem with the "standard" Phase 90 is that it isn't true bypase, it's what MXR calls "True Hardwire Bypass", which is misleading, and not TB. I always prefer Phase and Flange in front of the amp FWIW, but as always, YMMV.
https://www.premierguitar.com/articles/more-on-bypassing-the-hype-1
You can’t say that as a blanket statement. That precludes the Fuzz Face and it’s awesome pickup/pedal interaction, as well as some other pedals that use this (like the Mad Professor Royal Blue). Also, too high of an input impedance can be perceived as too bright. The TU-3 is an example of this. You’ll find people that upgraded from a TU-2 to a TU-3 and found their tone got brighter. The TU-3w actually has lower input impedance than the TU-3.I love this article; posted it here before:
http://screaminfx.com/tech/why-and-when-to-use-a-guitar-buffer-pedal.htm
General rule of thumb: the higher the input imp. and the lower the output imp. - the better. Then the signal passes through strong.
In the end, there’s no right or wrong, just preferences. Know how it all works so you can choose what works best for your situation.