Re: where to get REAL 500k pots,not undrated ones
Vulture, where did I say that that no one would be able to hear a 20% variance? If you had actually read my post without incredibly creative interpretation, you would find that I offered no opinion or leaning whatsoever as to whether that difference would be more likely noticeable or not. To be honest, I would be surprised if most people couldn't hear it in a real time shift from one to the other. The 2% change you seem certain you could reliably detect, I'm honestly a bit more skeptical of, yet I'm still not claiming certainty until I've seen or done testing to confirm it. Though skeptical, I would not be
terribly shocked (a bit surprised, yes) if it could be detected.
Without blind tests, your certainty or anyone else's in the absolute effects hold little more weight than the certainty held by people wearing magic bracelets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3RjPGOEFhE
Though I have a hunch that differences in pot value will not be discernible below somewhere in the 5% range in controlled testing, and hardly noticeable until at least 3 or 4 times that amount in applied use in performance, I'm not saying with any certainty that my assumptions are correct, or that anyone else's are wrong. All I
am saying is that I have a hard time believing anyone else's certainty is correct either, and if they really want to understand effects of such changes as honestly as possible, there are fairly simple tests which one could carry out to provide answers.
Briggleman, no hard feelings about the "nuts" comment (all in context - it's a forum, and I've been called worse

) and I understand your arguments as to helping the OP with their original question. Point taken, duly noted, and I was indeed in error by not at least referencing a source like RS in my original post. And no, it was not you who called me a deaf idiot, but rather the general tone of prior authors on both sides toward anyone who's experience or opinions may have been contrary.
No offense intended to anyone in regards to the "magical bracelets" comment and link, by the way. This is simply a poignant and tangible example of just how fallible our sense of certainty can sometimes be. It is referenced simply to emphasize the importance of controlled, blind testing to determine real effects of about anything, especially when involved with sensory perceptions so fickle as our hearing.