Wow, after all these years the G still tries to push SG as an alternative to a Strat ...... you gotta admire the conviction.
A strat is not defined solely as a guitar having three pickups.
It's guitar of the week #12Damn, what is that Firebird? Is that a new Gibson special run? Whatever it is, it's one of the most beautiful guitars I've ever seen... I'm stunned. :fing2:
Actually, the SG was supposed to replace the Les Paul. The Firebird is Gibson's answer to the strat.Wow, after all these years the G still tries to push SG as an alternative to a Strat ...... you gotta admire the conviction.
Many of the 60's rockers were using Gibsons and getting away from strats, not so much because strats were considered cheap, but more because Fenders were the guitar of choice of early 60's surf music; which was something the later 60's rockers did not want to be associated with.If it wasn't for Hendrix, you wouldn't be able to find a strat today because Fender was going to discontinue them due to lack of sales.
I....don't think the SG was ever intended as a competitor for the stratocaster. It was originally Ted McCarty's concept of an improvement on the Les Paul design, and was supposed to be the successor to that guitar.
Despite this guitar having three pickups (which I'm pretty sure is a "guitar of the week" and hence a limited run of 400) the SG has almost always differed from the strat in every way two solid-body electric guitars made of wood can possibly differ.
Maybe I'm unaware of some vintage ad copy from the '60s portraying the SG as Gibson's answer to the Strat, but this is the first I've heard that.