Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seeing?

Adieu

New member
I don't get it... last visit to my local GC, they have a perfectly functional and intact (albeit grimy) Peavey Valveking VK100 head used for $199... other side of the room, same head but NEW/CLEARANCE ITEM: $333, warranty box and all that rot (not even a scratch n dent or a refurb - I asked, and made sure I asked one of the trustworthy associates).

Priced like a 5w Bugera that can only hiss and sputter, and even then can't hold a candle to my cat??

Got em to let me playtest it thru a Marshall 1960A 4x12 just like the one I have - seemed to sound just fine. Made sure to use a mediocre-good-ish guitar, a PRS SE, to avoid being impressed by the axe not the amp. Kinda liked it, seemed like a decent hard rock/hair metal bit o crunch here, some nice searing lead there... Muuuuch more pleasant than that 5150/6505 crud, at least to me. So - why so cheap?!?! Just not really in demand for most popular whatever-core-of-the-week and djent that most buyers are wanting to emulate?

Any good reason to NOT buy this? The $199 one - or even cheaper on CL sometimes, from what I've seen...

Deep dark secrets? Reliability issues? Built out of dead babies? Or what?
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

They're made in China. That's it.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

My mind can't conceive of a person who prefers the Valveking over a 5150.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

Peavey as a company used to be defined by these things:
  • Made in America -> support local manufacturing and get some amount of good QA
  • Cheap. Namely, we don't pay fancy designers and all our stuff is ugly as sin.

Take away #1 and you have what? Ugly cheap chinese made products?

Peavey never knew how to run a brand. It's really a shame since some of the stuff has the mojo to sound good.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

My mind can't conceive of a person who prefers the Valveking over a 5150.

my mind cannot comprehend a person who'd PAY for a 5150... and nope, I'm not bashing Good Ol' Ed in the least - THAT sly fox GOT PAID for hanging out with it, placing lots of dummy stacks with it around him, and probably never even turning it on. All the while living it up on money from your fanboy pockets, and occasionally giving gag interviews where he'd laugh his arse off telling the most ridiculous and false secrets to his tone, and then move on to the next one and try to outdo himself yet again... Now that I can understand.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

They're made in China. That's it.

Works for me. (FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES)

Old Valve Special's still going strong no problems yet unlike my UK Marshall currently disassembled w/ me trying to reflow some solder on that fragile piece o junk... and the goooorgeous lurvey babe that is the PRS SE 30, with its $999 pricetag, has for the last few months been giving me the biggest instore amp woody ever... in other words, China amps, yes please, just please please please don't let any comrades anywhere near the manufacturing of any guitar I'm ever gonna own or even play. Btw, racism it ain't, Taiwanese Yamahas can be quite nicely done, and Japanese stuff rules, so I'm all for Asian stuff and even admit that ethnic Chinese too can build very well - just not in the PRC.


...so is *that* the only "surprise" here? Peavey just overdid its Go Us Go America pitch in earlier years and pissed people off with their faceheel turn with new Asian amps?? Everything else is properly tubular, and that weird "dial in from Class A to Class A/B and inbetween" ain't some disguised nasty piece of DSP??
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

I think the reason they are discounting the new ones is Peavey is about to release a newer "updated" valveking
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

my mind cannot comprehend a person who'd PAY for a 5150... and nope, I'm not bashing Good Ol' Ed in the least - THAT sly fox GOT PAID for hanging out with it, placing lots of dummy stacks with it around him, and probably never even turning it on. All the while living it up on money from your fanboy pockets, and occasionally giving gag interviews where he'd laugh his arse off telling the most ridiculous and false secrets to his tone, and then move on to the next one and try to outdo himself yet again... Now that I can understand.

Not that it matters, but I don't own and never have owned a 5150/6505. I do think it's a pretty nice high gain amp though, while the VK is ... not, to be polite.

And Ed definitely played through his 5150's. I have no idea why you think he didn't, but I'll add it to the ever-growing list of things you've been blatantly wrong about.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

my mind cannot comprehend a person who'd PAY for a 5150... and nope, I'm not bashing Good Ol' Ed in the least - THAT sly fox GOT PAID for hanging out with it, placing lots of dummy stacks with it around him, and probably never even turning it on. All the while living it up on money from your fanboy pockets, and occasionally giving gag interviews where he'd laugh his arse off telling the most ridiculous and false secrets to his tone, and then move on to the next one and try to outdo himself yet again... Now that I can understand.

I've owned both the 5150 and the Valveking, and I'd take the 5150 over the VK. Not because I was a Van Halen fan (I'd bet the VK would be better for that stuff anyway), but because it's got plenty of gain for just about anything.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

I'd use a Windsor before a VK. Sounds better, smoother. Also nicely priced.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

What were they, like $550 when they came out? I think the used prices reflect that just fine.
I remember some small problems with them here and there. Nothing major.
Boosted, they can cop a pretty nasty metal tone.
Basically, a low priced American rock amp made in China. Loud, and cheap is always good. Even just for the power section and then use another preamp, or pedal in front.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

Not that it matters, but I don't own and never have owned a 5150/6505. I do think it's a pretty nice high gain amp though, while the VK is ... not, to be polite.

And Ed definitely played through his 5150's. I have no idea why you think he didn't, but I'll add it to the ever-growing list of things you've been blatantly wrong about.

Who ever said I wanted a higain amp? :) For me, even an EPI VALVE SERIES is more than sufficient for any amount of gain, even amounts I generally don't care for

And no I'm not kidding. Simply use, in the following order, to cover any amount of gain needed:
1) lo to mid gain : stock Fenders, plugged straight
2) mid gain to hardrockish: decent humbucker guitars
3) hi gain hardrock, hairmetal: A8 pups
4) speed metal: add orange stompbox
5) searing metal leads: add green stompbox
6) modern higain altmetal: orange stombox into green stombox into amp (set halfway, everything across the board to noon, makes hair metal w/ any old humbuckers)
7) anything-core: active pups, 81/85
8) madness: 81/85 into green&orange - and this here's far PAST Scandinavian metal levels, arriving at truly Japanese- and Iowan-grade overkill.


...the one thing I haven't tried with the VK and would before buying is how it takes pedals. If it does ok-ish, it should be able to at least match an Epi Valve for gain, right? Then we're good already. Done and done.

PS my ideal level of gain from an amp? PRS 30.
PPS and Ed probably touched a Line 6 sometime in the last decade, at least once, just for curiosity. So what? Doesn't change the fact that ICONIC VAN HALEN STUFF = hotrodded MARSHALL.... 5150 is just an endorsement, a cash cow. He endorsed it cuz they paid him for it, not cuz he fell in love with it, and yes in studio, he used whatever struck his fancy, and not what Peavey advertising said... Sorta like Slash doesn't ACTUALLY play Slash humbuckers on albums - heck, he doesn't even use a Gibson at all, and his iconic "Gibby" was a custom build by some solo luthier, which later got a "head rebuild" to make it LOOK like the Gibson he endorsed.

Same way that NO, HETFIELD DOESN'T PLAY CHINESE/KOREAN LTD's OFF A GC WALL... his stage guitars with "LTD" on the headstock are ESP Japan custom shops with a different decal.
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

Oh, and btw, dude - who might you be? Seriously, you've got a list of things wrong with me, and I'm not even sure who you are or what we ever discussed, if anything... that's kinda sad. And impolite of you, considering how I'm clearly not chasing you around your threads to say mean things to you if I'm still not sure who you are yet, and certainly NOT crusading against your rights to personal opinions and your very own preferences.

It's just that, since this is a gear forum, preferences WOULD generally be to the tune of "I choose to have great expectations for this BRAND" ... NOT "I choose to have very low expectations for this PERSON".

Also, please figure out already (since you're following me so attentively as to have a list) that most of my good/bad views of something are "FOR THAT PRICE". $200 awesomeness = $2000 wtf. A Valveking, a 90s Ibanez Japan superstrat or 70s MIJ Les Paul copy, a good score on a cab, a used DS1, and an off-brand tubescreamer circuit can get you FULLY EQUIPPED, well enough as to get locally famous on if you're good - for $500 or LESS.... that sorta cash thrown at new Gibsons can get you, uhm, NOWHERE. or a gawdawful Melody Maker + a headphone amp. RAWK ON! - sure to get sweeeeet gigs with that, and the chicks dude, the chicks, they jump straight outta their panties upon seeing you rocking out on your couch in headphones.

...nice plan. UH, NOPE.
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

I've owned both the 5150 and the Valveking, and I'd take the 5150 over the VK. Not because I was a Van Halen fan (I'd bet the VK would be better for that stuff anyway), but because it's got plenty of gain for just about anything.

If 5150s were going for $199, maybe I'd take a rather more tolerant view of them myself... Still can't say I'd LIKE them much, but for two bills, something that gets a certain job in mind done without ever giving you them warm and fuzzy butterflies in your panties is pretty much fine by me, too... However, if the choice were by price, it'd really be between:

a) a 5150 alone
b) a VK 100, plus a full complete decent 1st-world-made bass rig - another nice old Jap bass, a top-knotch Seymour APB pickup upgrade, AND giggable-volume MiA bass amp (estimating a 5150 at $600, or 400* more than the VK100)

OR
c) an ESP Standard Eclipse II used

Well, the choice would, again, come down to b) vs. c). And would, yet again, be based on whether or not the Eclipse II was that quilted black cherry thing (it wasn't, hence I got the bass rig :)

AND , YES, I've gotten a Japanese bass, American Seymour Duncan active pickup upgrade, and American-made Carvin bass amp for $400, in fact that's my current bass rig right there... well except it's actually $20 more, but w/ 2 japanese basses, one with an active duncan, one with passive p/js, and a carvin probass 150w 1x15, and it cost me sum total $150 + $120 + $150:
*Ibanez RD707 fujigen-made punchy passive p/j w/ a godly neck
*a Washburn matsumoku-made Precision copy w/ improvements all around like a massive cast BadAss bridge copy and a heelless neck mount, and upgraded to boot w/ the early vintage Duncan APB pup w/ 3 boost microtoggles;
* and the '80s Carvin monstrosity.

The Washburn score was pure luck, no conclusive model name visible, missing all visible MIJ stickers (taken apart to clean, all parts are Japan) and only identifiable by old catalogs, plus some idgit soldered the tone pot IN REVERSE when dropping in the active Duncan pup, making the Guitar Center testers think it a tone-dead POS, when in fact they were just ZEROING the tone control.... which was hillarious. And the Ibanez was some n00b employee who missed the significance of the MiJ sticker, the F serial number, and the high model number, and priced it like a similarly styled, same colour same pointiness Gio entry-level RG six string, thinking they were the guitar and bass version of the same all-in-one starter kit package . Manager was like "wait, whaaaat? fujigen, japan? this? and we just sold it to you thinking it's some older-model Gio? daaaaang".


But anyway, back to the "why no love for the 5150" - i do have to honestly admit that I have exactly nothing in mind that I might want to play that'd be more suited to the 5150 (in my humble, twisted, warped perspective of said amp, of course). I see a variety of potentially interesting tones from the VK, pretty standard fare, yes, but it works and that's the point no? ...as to the 5150, even if I got that ESP Eclipse II w/EMGs - right up the alley of most 5150 players no? - I'd still not be interested. I like and kinda want that thing precisely because it doesn't sound like a one-trick icepick, and would certainly NEVER wanna plug it into anything like a 5150, an Orange, or a Rectifier.


I'd use a Windsor before a VK. Sounds better, smoother. Also nicely priced.

Windsor? Never seen em around here... never even heard of it. Too old and mostly forgotten, or too new and not yet widely known?

Nicely priced as compared to the $550 usual price someone here mentioned, or to the $333 new closeout / $199 used & fully functional options that first drew my eye towards this model?

...Cuz I'm liking it for those prices here, and with 550 unallocated bucks for shiny new toys (...well, ok, shiny used toys), I'd probably revert to pestering the several by-now-very-familiar local guys eternally trying to sell their ESP Eclipse Standards to see if one of them finally caves in and goes below that psychological $600 barrier... well either that or go find 50 more bucks somewhere lol.

On a separate note - weiiiiird... I've hit refresh like a gazillion times, literally a couple times before posting each time, and my browser's only now showing these last posts in the thread from like 10 hours ago. Which glitch probably, from other ppl's perspective, makes me look rather damn peculiar for replying to earlier trolls half the thread back, while ignoring interesting and constructive new input. Ooops.
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

Windsor? Never seen em around here... never even heard of it. Too old and mostly forgotten, or too new and not yet widely known?

Nicely priced as compared to the $550 usual price someone here mentioned, or to the $333 new closeout / $199 used & fully functional options that first drew my eye towards this model?

they were newly out 6-7 years or so? forget the new price, but they started turning up used for $150-225 for a marshall-voiced 100-watt head. just a nice cheap amp. one of those if it had a different name on it or if the color was just right people would be all over it.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

My first halfstack was a VK100 head over a MG412 cab. By no means a bad sounding setup in the grand scheme of things. It was a little buzzy in the gain, and a little sterile in the clean through the MG, but when I moved from that to a JCM2000&1960A I tried the VK through the 1960 and was much more impressed. Ended up selling it to a buddy who recorded a Ska album with it and it didn't come out half bad!

I think the big thing is that they aren't styled well, and I don't know if you picked it up but they feel fairly "cheap". Still, a steal at 200 IMHO!
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

Peavey has always just suffered from marketing and branding issues.

The very first thing they should have done was redesign that terrible, budget looking spiky logo.

Now that their high profile endorsees have left (Ed and now Satch), they just don't have the marketing pull or brand prestige factor to make the everyday guitarist pay any attention to them. It's a bit of a shame - my Wolfgang is hands down one of the best guitars I've ever owned.

The VK series are meant to be pretty solid amps, so maybe if it spins your wheels it's time to grab a bargain!
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

Peavey never knew how to run a brand.
Peavey has always just suffered from marketing and branding issues.

I'm no marketing genius, but...come on! Peavey has been making and SELLING (lots, and lots of selling) solid products for, what, oh yeah, 40 YEARS! And, by pretty much every measure, are a successful company. It just cracks me up to read comments like the ones quoted. If you want to bash Peavey, you need to say things like, "they sound like sh!t" or "all the knobs fell off" or something like that.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

And Ed definitely played through his 5150's. I have no idea why you think he didn't, but I'll add it to the ever-growing list of things you've been blatantly wrong about.

I have heard that although Ed played through 5150s they were gutted and many parts were replaced with Soldano parts or something weird like that.
 
Re: Why are Valveking 100s so dang cheap? Something really wrong with em I'm not seei

I liked the Peaved Classic 30 and Classic 20 I had for years quite a bit. I had one of the Valveking Combos for a year or so. Tried all kinds of tube and speaker swaps, and did not find any tones that I really liked. I found it very sterile and boring.
 
Back
Top