Diocletian
BrandNewGlossologist
Re: Why do people like single cutaways?
I have a Les Paul Black Beauty (single cut), an SG (double cut), a Jackson Soloist (double cut) and a Jackson RR (V, no cut!).
I don't understand how the single cut is supposed to be any worse in functionality? The Soloist is the best one for upper fret access. The RR and LP are the worst (not that it's any problem).
This is because the Soloist has thru-neck, the SG has an incredibly thin neck and joint, but the LP and RR have larger bolt on/set necks with larger neck to body joins which contribute much more to the "functionality".
So, again, I don't see what the issue is with single cutaways - it's completely irrelevant. More important IMO is the neck type and joint size.
I have a Les Paul Black Beauty (single cut), an SG (double cut), a Jackson Soloist (double cut) and a Jackson RR (V, no cut!).
I don't understand how the single cut is supposed to be any worse in functionality? The Soloist is the best one for upper fret access. The RR and LP are the worst (not that it's any problem).
This is because the Soloist has thru-neck, the SG has an incredibly thin neck and joint, but the LP and RR have larger bolt on/set necks with larger neck to body joins which contribute much more to the "functionality".
So, again, I don't see what the issue is with single cutaways - it's completely irrelevant. More important IMO is the neck type and joint size.
Last edited: