A cab size discussion...

Don't know about Carvian cabs, but Randall makes good solid cabs. Theirs sound like Marshalls did in the 1960s and early 1970s.

Almost all Carvin cabs are birch plywood and are some of the most robust and best sounding cabs around. Have owned a number of them over the years.
 
Almost all Carvin cabs are birch plywood and are some of the most robust and best sounding cabs around. Have owned a number of them over the years.

Makes me glad I have my G412T from 2000.

I thought maybe because the speakers were Carvin made they weren't as highly regarded as a real Celestion.

That said these are 100 watt speakers each.
 
I didn't know 1x15"s were a thing for guitar--just bass.

Lots of guys use 15s, Page, Hendrix, and Dimebag. They are not too much different than 12s just much fuller.

Is this the cab you had your Peavey Classic 20 running though when I came over? Great sounding little rig.

Yep, that is the cab. That amp is my daily driver. I play the Classic 20 with the 1x15 more than any other amp I own. ​
 
Thanks. I thought there was more going on in there than what there was.

Yeah El Dunco mentions the most important thing we haven't discussed which is cab durability, which unfortunately seems to come at the cost of weight.

With the touring rig emphasis now on small, lightweight stuff that's easy to transport, I wonder if cab build quality has suffered since 2010 or so when halfstacks started going out of style.

My Carvin was originally a full stack I planned to gig with, but it was overkill so I sold one of the 4x12s.
Funny story, my Dad being a carpenter and doing his research made a 2x10 bass cabinet out of beautiful woods at least an inch thick, gave each speaker its own partition. It sounded absolutely amazing loaded with Eminence deltas but weighed as much as a 4x10, maybe more.
 
I think those are just called jackplates? I don't know if there's a technical term for them. Marshall cabs are notorious for breaking and causing connections to break, thus risking blowing transformers. :S

They're not crossovers. They don't separate the bass from the treble frequencies (that's what a crossover in audio is, right?). They just have different options for stereo/mono, parallel/series, or cab linking.

You are correct. Its rare for a guitar cabinet to have any kind of crossover. There are some exceptions. People have had absolutely horrible results using the first Randall Warhead through a regular 4x12. To make proper use of it, it really does need the matching fullstack that features a crossover to let more bass through the 2x15 which is absent in the top cabinet.

That full setup can actually sound absolutely fantastic in person. It’s possible to mic but you do have to blend both cabinets but it’s far from impossible. Having the entire range summed to one halfstack causes the muddiness people complain about. Obviously as well as getting rid of the digital effects, this is something that was addressed in the X2. It would have been nice for them to have an output designed to sound good into a regular 4x12 halfstack for people who just owned the head and were already happy with their cabinet because it’s bafflingly unusable (without so many tweaks it defeats the purpose) for anyone who doesn’t understand it was made with that fullstack with the 2x15 on the bottom in mind.
 
Lots of guys use 15s, Page, Hendrix, and Dimebag. They are not too much different than 12s just much fuller.



Yep, that is the cab. That amp is my daily driver. I play the Classic 20 with the 1x15 more than any other amp I own. ​

I thought a 1x15" would be considered flabby for guitar--maybe like an 18" for bass.

I have a 2x15" Randall cab. The lower half of the old Warhead stack.
 
I thought a 1x15" would be considered flabby for guitar--maybe like an 18" for bass.

A lot of people have misconceptions about speaker size. I have two 1x15 amps, and they both sound fantastic. The Celestion is very tight-sounding. The main reason guitar players do not use 15s is their size can rapidly increase the size of cabinets, making them bulky and difficult to move. 12s seem to be the sweet spot for size and power handling.
 
IME, 15" are more scoopy rather than flabby, but I've never tried a guitar-dedicated 15", and bass speakers tend to be more scooped anyways. But they're also really clean, mostly, so they're not "flabby" either.

The guy from Mastodon has a signature Friedman cab that has two 12" V30's or Greenbacks, don't remember, and two 15" Fullbacks.

I'm not sure if it's a rule of thumb, but if you extrapolate it to 10" speakers, I don't think 10" speakers are necessarily tighter. All of the 10" Celestions I've tried rather than being "tighter" are just narrower-sounding. Meaning less bass and less treble. And the treble they have is kinda small-combo-like. Like fizzy, raspy, and just overall ugly. I hate 10" speakers for high-gain. They have all just sounded toy-like to me.
 
Last edited:
IME, 15" are more scoopy rather than flabby, but I've never tried a guitar-dedicated 15", and bass speakers tend to be more scooped anyways.

I think that most of the problem is most people who have played 15s tried them in a bass amp. Which can sound great depending on the application. Burt 15s designed for guitar and especially the more modern speakers sound very much like their 12-inch counterparts. Just more fullness and thump.

If I could find a Randall Warhead B cab I would grab it in a second

z2j8x4ds1t2quurrgwjo.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think that most of the problem is most people who have played 15s tried them in a bass amp. Which can sound great depending on the application. Burt 15s designed for guitar and especially the more modern speakers sound very much like their 12-inch counterparts. Just more fullness and thump.

If I could find a Randall Warhead B cab I would grab it in a second

z2j8x4ds1t2quurrgwjo.jpg

That is what I have, but with a silver face and much more beat up.
 
It'd be interesting to hear how those record. I don't think Dime ever used them in the studio, did he?

Not to my knowledge. I think the 2x15 was used for more live fullness from a one guitar band. I've also heard most people say the Warhead v1 had crappy built in fx. I barely saw any of the V2s with the green logo. The only guy I saw use the Warhead V2 was the shady guitar teacher Tom Hess.

Fairly sure Dime scrammed to Krank just after the V2 Warhead was introduced.
 
I like my 2x10 1x15 Carvin R1000 combo. I like the 15 for giving more low end. The 8x10 Ampeg style stuff I see seems to be more for clank bass, especially ones with aluminum cones, but I stand to be corrected by people who have more experience than I do.

Also, I had a buddy at GIT who played a Parker Nitefly (one of the high end 90s ones with DiMarzios). He would split his rig into high and low cabs with a crossover because he was in a one guitar hardcore/groove band.

Can anyone suggest to me a crossover that could be used with guitar cabs? I'm not sure how he did it.
 
I like my 2x10 1x15 Carvin R1000 combo. I like the 15 for giving more low end. The 8x10 Ampeg style stuff I see seems to be more for clank bass, especially ones with aluminum cones, but I stand to be corrected by people who have more experience than I do.

Also, I had a buddy at GIT who played a Parker Nitefly (one of the high end 90s ones with DiMarzios). He would split his rig into high and low cabs with a crossover because he was in a one guitar hardcore/groove band.

Can anyone suggest to me a crossover that could be used with guitar cabs? I'm not sure how he did it.
Oh, the 8x10 Ampeg can do a lot of things. Many reggae players use those, so it's not just a clanky rock bass amp. The tweeter is also defeatable on the newer ones. I actually think the tweeter thing is more of a clean or slap bass thing. It sounds like shit once you start throwing some overdrive in there.

I also like blending in a 4x12 for some midrange snarl on recorded bass tones. You gotta try it. The cabs Hendrix used in the 70's were actually supposed to be bass cabs, AFAIK.
 
Back
Top