aleclee said:Thin? Because it lacks the mids of EVH's early tone.
Buzzy? Because there's so much preamp gain/compression and is often scooped (compared to, say, EVH's early tone) that what starts as "crunch" becomes more shrill.
All IMO of course.![]()
nuntius said:eh?
so you rigged it so people wouldnt vote for who you wouldnt want to win?
Grandor said:I rigged it so that everyone wouldnt vote for the obvious.
What would I want with a poll where everyone votes for the one guy that everyone knows everyone will vote for. Theres no point.
Thats like having a poll saying:
Who's the better band:
Led Zeppelin
or
The spice girls.
Of course everyone is gonna say led zeppelin.
But
The spice girls
vs.
Britney spears
Would be a much nicer poll cause we'd see something worth seeing.
BTW- im not comparing anyone in this poll to britney spears or the spice girls.
lol
TwilightOdyssey said:Becker is a GOD, but is tone in Cacaphony was awful!!![]()
Zerberus said:I know that there are a few that differ from the lump of mud in the middle, but for me most of it is just soulless "Fretboard Masturbation", with a few notable exceptions like Satch. Sorry![]()
\m/(00)\m/ said:spice girls rockl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:headbang:
\m/(00)\m/ said:i dont knwo why so many people think shred tone is thin and buzzy sounding ?
maybe yngwie but he's an idiot![]()
Metalman_666 said:LMAO!! dude you best watch out... some swedish fan club of Yngwie's is gonna take off your head! :rocket:
good job though :newangel:
Zerberus said:WhoTF is Michael Romeo? I only know Michael Angelo.
That said: IMO Shred = thinnest possible tone acheivable = Nothing I could like, regardless of how stoned I am.
I know that there are a few that differ from the lump of mud in the middle, but for me most of it is just soulless "Fretboard Masturbation", with a few notable exceptions like Satch. Sorry![]()