Re: Riff-Off 2.4: Stockholm Syndrome vs. Chumble Spuzz
Upon first listen both riffs seem cluttered with unnecessary fluff.
Stockholm's distorted tone is downright offensive. Each time I've listened to it I wish it faded in or somehow prepared me for the dirty, flubby, fizzy, lazy, plodding, annoyingness.
Chumble's instantly sounds like a riff Iron Maiden would have thrown away in about 1984. The delay is a little distracting and the crunchy payoff seems cliche and makes me say "really? Are you serious?"
Having said all that, and after a few more listens, my ears start to sort through the fluff and get to the riffage.
Stockholm's does seem to have a cool, almost classic rock vibe about it. It sounds like an intro to an Alice in Chains or Smashing Pumpkins song. It's not bad, but to me ears it sounds like a prelude to the real riff which should immediately follow.
Chumble's riff is more ambitious and attempts to deliver a variety of emotions. My favorite part of it is the dramatic pauses after the first few bars. This is presumably done to let the echo ring out but it's also a great contrast to the crunch that immediately follows.
I'd love to hear each of these with the effects and fuzz stripped away but in the end I think I have to go with Chumble.