Inflames626
New member
So I finally played around with these a bit since my last post after having set my guitar up to my liking 100%.
Guitar: LTD EC-256
Pickups: A2PN (nickel cover)/Custom 5 black coils, SD logo
2 Triple Shots, phase switch on neck pickup, .22uf master tone knob, independent volume controls
Tuned D standard, 10 gauge Ernie Balls
Independent volume controls
The guitar I was comparing it to is my Hamer Scarab, which has a 57 Classic Plus in the neck and a 498T in the bridge.
Ultimately there were tradeoffs. I don't like one set better than the other, which is good because it keeps me from having the same guitar in my collection twice.
Of the SD sets I've tried, the 59 is my least favorite. The A2PN has an interesting sound and a lot more personality than the 59.
I expected more warmth and low end from the A2PN but I got a flute like tone which would complement an EBow well. Playing with the Triple Shots didn't seem to have much effect. Turning the tone control full bass helped, but I think going to a .47 uf cap will get me the sound I'm hearing in my head.
The 57+ sounded thicker and had more "woo woo" expression with bends, but less of a flute like sound. The A2PN had kind of a notched, hollow mid quality. Comparing the 57+ against an A2PB in the neck may be a fairer comparison.
I expected the A2PN to be the warmest, then the 59, then maybe the Pearly Gates, then the Jazz. But I was surprised at how clean the A2PN is. It reminded me a lot of a Demon. I could easily see an A2PN/Demon set.
The real surprise in this guitar is the Custom 5. It is super versatile with a Triple Shot. Going parallel and out of phase in the bridge gave it an EMG 60 quality.
Being a Custom 5 it of course retained the thumpy scooped mid heavy sounds for low tunings, but once it goes parallel it is a totally different pickup. Really a genius design for SD.
I think the C5 may work very well as a warm neck humbucker in series and a clean, bright neck pickup in parallel. I'll have to see as a I have C5/Custom project planned.
To my ear the C5 is not a 498T killer. The 498T is the best bridge pickup I've ever played and, aside from an EMG 81, is the only pickup I'd use for rhythm and lead from the bridge even when recording. The 498T just does everything other than pay my taxes for me.
But the C5 comes close. It's just a little warmer, sludgier, more scooped--definitely a doom metal pickup. Maybe the Custom will be closer to the 498T with its increased mids.
It seems like the C5 is usually in the Custom's shadow, but SD should promote the C5 more. It's a great pickup.
I may move to an A2PB in the neck or go to a .47uf cap to get more of the sound I'm hearing in my head from the neck.
Output wise they are pretty mismatched. Since I record instead of playing live I set the pickups very close to the strings for the best tone.
In a live situation I'd back the C5 down or use a boost when going to the A2PN. You'll have to play with the heights a bit to get them to match.
Conclusion: may swap out the A2PN for an A2PB in the neck.
I'd be curious to hear Aceman 's thoughts on this.
That's all folks. Thanks for reading.
Guitar: LTD EC-256
Pickups: A2PN (nickel cover)/Custom 5 black coils, SD logo
2 Triple Shots, phase switch on neck pickup, .22uf master tone knob, independent volume controls
Tuned D standard, 10 gauge Ernie Balls
Independent volume controls
The guitar I was comparing it to is my Hamer Scarab, which has a 57 Classic Plus in the neck and a 498T in the bridge.
Ultimately there were tradeoffs. I don't like one set better than the other, which is good because it keeps me from having the same guitar in my collection twice.
Of the SD sets I've tried, the 59 is my least favorite. The A2PN has an interesting sound and a lot more personality than the 59.
I expected more warmth and low end from the A2PN but I got a flute like tone which would complement an EBow well. Playing with the Triple Shots didn't seem to have much effect. Turning the tone control full bass helped, but I think going to a .47 uf cap will get me the sound I'm hearing in my head.
The 57+ sounded thicker and had more "woo woo" expression with bends, but less of a flute like sound. The A2PN had kind of a notched, hollow mid quality. Comparing the 57+ against an A2PB in the neck may be a fairer comparison.
I expected the A2PN to be the warmest, then the 59, then maybe the Pearly Gates, then the Jazz. But I was surprised at how clean the A2PN is. It reminded me a lot of a Demon. I could easily see an A2PN/Demon set.
The real surprise in this guitar is the Custom 5. It is super versatile with a Triple Shot. Going parallel and out of phase in the bridge gave it an EMG 60 quality.
Being a Custom 5 it of course retained the thumpy scooped mid heavy sounds for low tunings, but once it goes parallel it is a totally different pickup. Really a genius design for SD.
I think the C5 may work very well as a warm neck humbucker in series and a clean, bright neck pickup in parallel. I'll have to see as a I have C5/Custom project planned.
To my ear the C5 is not a 498T killer. The 498T is the best bridge pickup I've ever played and, aside from an EMG 81, is the only pickup I'd use for rhythm and lead from the bridge even when recording. The 498T just does everything other than pay my taxes for me.
But the C5 comes close. It's just a little warmer, sludgier, more scooped--definitely a doom metal pickup. Maybe the Custom will be closer to the 498T with its increased mids.
It seems like the C5 is usually in the Custom's shadow, but SD should promote the C5 more. It's a great pickup.
I may move to an A2PB in the neck or go to a .47uf cap to get more of the sound I'm hearing in my head from the neck.
Output wise they are pretty mismatched. Since I record instead of playing live I set the pickups very close to the strings for the best tone.
In a live situation I'd back the C5 down or use a boost when going to the A2PN. You'll have to play with the heights a bit to get them to match.
Conclusion: may swap out the A2PN for an A2PB in the neck.
I'd be curious to hear Aceman 's thoughts on this.
That's all folks. Thanks for reading.