Trainwreck anyone?

Re: Trainwreck anyone?

Would that be high gain enough from some of you freaks? :)

So, EL34's or EL84's? :)
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

Thanks for participating in this market research. Donuts and beer to follow.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

You may be familiar with this place already, but....

thank for the link ... I haven't seen it.

I've played a Komet 60. Not a lot, but almost enough to say it is a pretty loud amp that has to be cranked to open up. Nothing new I suppose, but it was so loud I couldn't really get a good read on it in a fairly small space.

this topic is debated ad infinitum on the Gear Page, as well as Dumbles.
both were built on a very individual basis, to fit the player. I think Ken gave his names, like children.

I would love to play one myself, as I play with my fingers and love responsive amps.

beyond that, I think it's really unfortunate that Ken Fischer isn't able to be out there actively in the amp building community.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

I'm seriously entertaining the idea of the EL34 Express. Maybe put in an option for a switchable ss to tube rectifier.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

Wow, that clip was pretty cool. I wonder how it's done. I was thinking that it would be cool to design a feedback circuit that would degenerate into chaos when a certain amplitude of guitar signal was input into it, thus distorting fairly easily depending on how you pick.

Does anyone know how trainwrecks do it?
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

I should clarify, I wasn't thinking that the chaotic feedback circuit would result in a touch sensitive amp, I was more interested in what kind of distortion it could cause without necessarily pushing the preamp tubes with a big signal, however, after listening to the clip, it dawned on me that it might be able to be used for that kind of duality.

That certainly would be a fun little thing to experiment with.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

I've heard that part of the magic is the exact values as stated with 0% tolerance.

Luke

That would make me even more curious about whether they are in fact using a somewhat controlled chaos in their amps. Chaos requires very specific conditions to occur and they might know some circuits which produce some sort of volume dependant chaos (the harder pick attacks, etc...). This is beginning to become very interesting for me.

Then again, I could be completely wrong :laugh2:
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

I was under the impression that 0% tolerance parts are impossible to produce, theres always variance.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

I was under the impression that 0% tolerance parts are impossible to produce, theres always variance.

Small enough that it's not discernable with their equipment is probably what is meant.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

The four TW vids were posted in several places last year. I saved them to my harddrive. The next paragraph is from Geetarpicker (LP Forum)

'59 Les Paul, '92 Callaham strat. 89' Trainwreck Express. '68 Marshall 4x12 slant, w/25s. Amp has old telefunken 12ax7s, and x2 new Groove tube EL34s. No pedals, no master volume, no attenuator. EARPLUGS THOUGH!


what tubes were in that video and was it an express or a rocket?
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

I was under the impression that 0% tolerance parts are impossible to produce, theres always variance.

From what I understand he tests the parts and if they aren't what they are supposed to be, right on the money of their stated value, they are rejected for said amp.

Like someone said earlier I've heard he names each and EVERY one. You tell him WHICH Trainwreck you played.

I don't know maybe there is some controlled chaos/voodoo in those circuits.

Luke
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

On the subject of components, I've been testing every resistor, coupling cap and pot that goes into each amp. They've got to meet a certain tolerance test that I apply. Sometimes, it's not the absolute value of a component that matters as much as matching a pair of components where the signal benefits from two values being identical. The only exception to this rule are electrolytic caps. I just overdo it on those values enough to cover any variances.

I do think the greatest benefit of this is from a QC aspect. It takes a lot of variance out of production. One Edana ought to sound just like any other Edana.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

God I love that clip!!! If it weren't after midnight here I'd be firing up my Komet and plugging in my strat :D

Awesome amps...I hope to have a Connie one day too ;) They really only have one volume setting though...BLOODY LOUD! They're made to play with bands and I'm going to get a band going just so I can use the Komet...some sort of southern rock thing.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

Hmmm watching that trainwreck clip again I think if I did crank up the Komet now I'd just be annoyed because it wouldn't sound like that!

Probably much closer than most other amps...but there is still something there that is the reason why they cost about $10,000 more than a Komet ;)
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

Scott,
if you read about the Komet and 'wrecks, they were simple circuits with no "features" -
It has NO reverb, master volume, effects loop, foot swtiches, pull pots, transistors or chips ANYWHERE. The chassis is solid aluminum, chosen for the very particular electrical properties that it possesses. Inside the chassis you won't find printed circuits, cotton or imitation cotton wire or fiber tag boards. We don't design with obsolete or questionable materials to "be in fashion."

so component values and physical layout were critical

for instance, if you were to add the effect of standard tolerance components, you could get varying results in the same circuit

I'm obviously stating the obvious. :)

a simple analogy though is a Fuzz Face, which is a very simple circuit, but from what we know, the good ones were totally dependent on the value of the components

On the subject of components, I've been testing every resistor, coupling cap and pot that goes into each amp. They've got to meet a certain tolerance test that I apply. Sometimes, it's not the absolute value of a component that matters as much as matching a pair of components where the signal benefits from two values being identical.
 
Re: Trainwreck anyone?

Im not trying to be a downer here but cloneing a 'Wreck is not as easy as simply building it off the schematic and using really high dollar parts...Kenny did a lot of things in those amps that were never written down on any schematic anywhere, things that make a huge difference.

Im not saying that someone could not build an amp that is a copy of the schematic from an Express or a Rocket or whatever but building a true clone is out of the question.

Im sure if someone were to build an amp off a Trainwreck schematic it would be a great sounding amp but I can't see it being anywhere as amazing as a real 'Wreck
 
Back
Top