Re: What's the point in big 100 watt heads?
Random thoughts and memories...
It's one of the reasons I've collected a stableful of Mesa amps, ranging in power from 10 to 200 watts. And I don't think that was a normal thing back in the '60s and '70s. Guys seemed to have one amp and used it for everything and every venue.
Remember now that I am, not only old-school, but older than dirt as well. So I'm used to hearing and playing big amps. My first good amp was a BF Fender Bandmaster 212 rig, and there were stages where I was out-gunned and small rooms where it couldn't be turned up at all.
In the '60s, one festival I did provided Vox Super Beatles. Compared to the Bandmaster, they sounded like crap!
I played at a festival one time in the early '70s, and the provided backline for the guitarists were two SF Dual Showman 215 rigs, daisy-chained together. Talk about blowing your pant-legs in the wind! Routinely in clubs you'd see Ampeg V-4s or VT-22s, Acoustic 150s or 270s, or the big boy Fenders: Twins, Showmans, Super Six and Quad Reverbs. And sometimes guys would use a PAIR of Super Reverbs, Concerts, or even Bassman heads. SUNNs were also very popular. Their bass amps could go so loud, they'd turn your guts to jelly. And then came the Marshalls, Music Man and Mesa stacks.
And we laughed at guys who showed up with only a Deluxe Reverb. Student amp!
Even then there were guys who favored small cranked amps over the big 100-watters. But I saw a lot of guys happy with their big amps barely cracked open too...including a couple of jazz cats playing their big boxes thru 100-watt half-stacks.
And then I saw Barney Kessel and Herb Ellis in Seattle, both diming cheap-ass Univox 25-watt SS amps, and sounding fabulous. ("You're famous and you're playing through THAT?")
One thing I've learned over the years is that there are a lot of ways to get the job done, and my way might not work for you. I like my Mesa amps; they are one of the very few amps on the market with the versatility to play the many genres I cover. I like the build quality and the professional features; great cleans and distorted tones. I'd have to go for a modelling amp to get anything close. I have several now, and enjoy them all, but if I could only have ONE amp, it would still be a Mesa.
Some guys don't need or want that versatility and choose one amp; or, some will get an amp with great clean tones and modify their pedal boards to fit each gig.
For many years I played mostly clean rhythm parts, and concentrated on my singing. Pop music has changed so much, a lot of players never play clean...don't know what CLEAN is. Even playing clean, an amp can have too much headroom. A compressor can help even things out a bit. I like the "muscularity" of a big amp...those big solid lows, the KRANG!
A few years ago I had the chance to play a new Marshall Plexi Stack Reissue that my local GC got in. The amp was hella loud, of course. With permission, I cranked it to about 7 and started in on a few of my favorite rifts from AC/DC, The Who, and Free. Call it an epiphany...for a few moments I was standing with some of my heroes. It put a lot into perspective. And I've not heard many modern Master Volume, high-gain amps grab that tone. Certainly not from a pedal.
It all comes down to using the right tool for the job. That specially curved distributor wrench makes tuning your 289 Mustang a lot easier. The modern guitarist needs a great amp and a competent backup. He may need several amps to cover different venues and different genres. That may or may not include a 100-watt behemoth.
But man, they are fun to play!
Bill