Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

Actually, it seems to be, as it does actually translate into sales. At the end of the day, most guitarists want the right pickup for them, and don't have endless time for charts, debates, and endless speculation about a company's motives. They just want to get on to making music. What is provided to me was enough for me to make the right decisions, and after I installed them, I went on to writing, performing and recording. My thought is that many people take the information, and make a decision. Obsessing over what isn't provided keeps people from actually playing. I have to say, if anyone wastes a grand on pickup swaps, they aren't spending enough time actually playing.

You continue to insist that this marry-go-round of reading fluffy product descriptions, mining for subjective opinions on forums, and swapping pickups numerous times is somehow efficient and saves time. Likewise, I don't know what leads you to believe a more technically correct approach would somehow use up even more time.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

That's just it- I don't think most people swap pickups that much. They simply make a choice with the provided info and get on to playing.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

You've never heard of The Great Tone Quest? The quest that seemingly goes on forever and ever? Maybe that amp will scratch the itch. Maybe that pickup will give me Stevie's tone. Frankly, the existence of this forum is a testament to the endlessness of the pursuit. And you're a moderator of the forum, seemingly with more dedication than anyone. We should take a pole as to the most number of pickup swaps anyone has done to any one guitar.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

Here's the thing. I'm kinda liking this guy PicRiveraTele as he's knowledgeable and tells it straight whether you agree with him or not. Anyway, to the naysayers who insist on defending like fanbois, I'll say this. No, you cannot describe an apple to anyone without a frame of reference. If you have 10 different types of apples, then someone who has eaten one apple, can get an idea of what other types of apples taste like if given good descriptions and other references they can relate to. There is a definite difference between a green apple and a Fuji apple, and that difference has been described for centuries.

Now if a chef (as in this analogy a guitar builder) is going to cook a recipe and wants to know which apple would be ideal for that recipe, he'd either have to go to the store and sample a dozen apples (you can't realistically do that with pickups), or get on the Internet and look up a good description of various apples to determine which one would most likely have the sweetness, tartness, and acidity you want for a particular recipe. As you can see, building a guitar using various woods and other components has to synergize with the pickups that go into it.

Let's say the chef went to the #1 leader in apple sales website and looked up a description of their apples, then got them only to find out that the description was off. You see how that can cause a problem?

Then there's the technical aspect, and someone looking from a direction of circuits and capacitors might say "Ah all overdrive pedals sound the same. They're the same circuit. Stop wasting your money, etc." Then the other 95% of the people will say, "You're wrong because I can hear the difference." It's like someone saying Klon Centaurs aren't worth $2000 when there have been credible, knowledgeable players who swear by them and a host of albums where they've been part of iconic tones, but then someone comes along and says this clone or that clone is better because it's only $100.

Whatever the case is, I have enough of an idea from a technical standpoint and enough experience to know about a lot of different pickups. Therefore, the truth is that tone is not always subjective. It can be described, and is best described with common frames of reference, and it can be measured to at least a reasonable extent. Pico has a point and it may just be a business tactic to maintain market control. No one ever said everyone at SD were angels, and no one is going to like their pickups less because of it. At the same time, it would be helpful if SD, being the market leader, could put a little more into helping users decide the right pickup... and I'm not talking about a stupid thing that asks you what kind of body, bridge, style of music and then recommend the same selection of pickups no matter what you input. I just mean they can do a better job of gauging and describing their products. Enough said.

Before I continue to melt, my point was just that the values arent that drastically off. I mean what is a 4? Or a 3? Now if they listed a pup as say a 3 in treble, and yet when you play it sounds like all high frequencies and brittle, I would consider that very misleading. I am sure your experience is far greater than mine, its just the
amount off isnt exactly mind blowing. Thanks for the comments

I don't know why you keep getting stuck on the numbers. The variance in numbers IS quite significant when you take into consideration the whole description. 3,7,7, shows shallow lows, high mids, and equally high treble. However, if you ever played a Custom Custom, you'd realize that it has as much bass as a JB or Duncan Distortion even though it might have a different kind of low end that's maybe not as tight. Also, it makes it look like the treble is equal to the midrange, but it's not. In fact, you hear mostly midrange and the treble end isn't equal to the amount of mids. Therefore, if you bump the bass up to 4 as say a JB or a Distortion, raise the midrange, and lower the treble just a touch, it would probably give you a better idea of a midrange pickup that's said to warm up bright guitars. That's all beside the point anyway because it was just an example. I'll bet that if you analyzed the frequencies, the Custom Custom would NOT be 3,7,7 and would be more like 4,8,7 (of course in whatever equivalent hz or decibles or whatever measurement the instrumentation shows). Furthermore, since it's only a 3-band EQ chart, you have to consider that you're adding the low mids and high mids together. Moreover, it's a 14k or so pickup that's rated as "hot" yet why on a scale of 0 to 10 does it only make it up to 7? These things are too arbitrarily determined to give buyers a truly relative view.

Is this not an official forum for DiMarzio? http://www.dimarzioforum.com/forum/index.php

It's not an official forum... like I told you.
 
Last edited:
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

You've never heard of The Great Tone Quest? The quest that seemingly goes on forever and ever? Maybe that amp will scratch the itch. Maybe that pickup will give me Stevie's tone. Frankly, the existence of this forum is a testament to the endlessness of the pursuit. And you're a moderator of the forum, seemingly with more dedication than anyone. We should take a pole as to the most number of pickup swaps anyone has done to any one guitar.

Here's the thing. I'm kinda liking this guy PicRiveraTele as he's knowledgeable and tells it straight whether you agree with him or not. Anyway, to the naysayers who insist on defending like fanbois, I'll say this. No, you cannot describe an apple to anyone without a frame of reference. If you have 10 different types of apples, then someone who has eaten one apple, can get an idea of what other types of apples taste like if given good descriptions and other references they can relate to. There is a definite difference between a green apple and a Fuji apple, and that difference has been described for centuries.

Now if a chef (as in this analogy a guitar builder) is going to cook a recipe and wants to know which apple would be ideal for that recipe, he'd either have to go to the store and sample a dozen apples (you can't realistically do that with pickups), or get on the Internet and look up a good description of various apples to determine which one would most likely have the sweetness, tartness, and acidity you want for a particular recipe. As you can see, building a guitar using various woods and other components has to synergize with the pickups that go into it.

Let's say the chef went to the #1 leader in apple sales website and looked up a description of their apples, then got them only to find out that the description was off. You see how that can cause a problem?

. . .

Whatever the case is, I have enough of an idea from a technical standpoint and enough experience to know about a lot of different pickups. Therefore, the truth is that tone is not always subjective. It can be described, and is best described with common frames of reference, and it can be measured to at least a reasonable extent. Pico has a point and it may just be a business tactic to maintain market control. No one ever said everyone at SD were angels, and no one is going to like their pickups less because of it. At the same time, it would be helpful if SD, being the market leader, could put a little more into helping users decide the right pickup... and I'm not talking about a stupid thing that asks you what kind of body, bridge, style of music and then recommend the same selection of pickups no matter what you input. I just mean they can do a better job of gauging and describing their products. Enough said.



I don't know why you keep getting stuck on the numbers. The variance in numbers IS quite significant when you take into consideration the whole description. 3,7,7, shows shallow lows, high mids, and equally high treble. However, if you ever played a Custom Custom, you'd realize that it has as much bass as a JB or Duncan Distortion even though it might have a different kind of low end that's maybe not as tight. Also, it makes it look like the treble is equal to the midrange, but it's not. In fact, you hear mostly midrange and the treble end isn't equal to the amount of mids. Therefore, if you bump the bass up to 4 as say a JB or a Distortion, raise the midrange, and lower the treble just a touch, it would probably give you a better idea of a midrange pickup that's said to warm up bright guitars. That's all beside the point anyway because it was just an example. I'll bet that if you analyzed the frequencies, the Custom Custom would NOT be 3,7,7 and would be more like 4,8,7 (of course in whatever equivalent hz or decibles or whatever measurement the instrumentation shows). Furthermore, since it's only a 3-band EQ chart, you have to consider that you're adding the low mids and high mids together. Moreover, it's a 14k or so pickup that's rated as "hot" yet why on a scale of 0 to 10 does it only make it up to 7? These things are too arbitrarily determined to give buyers a truly relative view.

Real tone chasers buy the equipment and try it for themselves. If you are not in a position to do that, it's your finances that are the problem, not a web site or a forum.

In my SG, a vintage 70's Seymour-wound JB is 6-7-6.
In my SG, a new JB is 5-8-6.
In my Les Paul, the same new JB is 4-8-5.

So what scientifically-accurate numbers should SD put on the web site to help you?
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

Yeah, pickup tone charts... so what? Who gives a ****?

I never paid much attention to them anyways... and they're certainly not worthy of pages of argumentative diddling and masturbatory scientific posturing.

It's obvious at this point in the game (and it is a game) that these "gripes" are about something much deeper than pickup tone charts.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

WTF happened here?

Some of you really should get off the internet and go play guitar or something. Does anyone honestly even look at those charts or read the description? Thankfully I have a pretty good idea of what I like, but the drawer full of pickups is how I got here. I can tell you NONE of the videos or “tone samples” had any influence because what matters is how it sounds thru my rig with me playing.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

Yeah, pickup tone charts... so what? Who gives a ****?

I never paid much attention to them anyways... and they're certainly not worthy of pages of argumentative diddling and masturbatory scientific posturing.

It's obvious at this point in the game (and it is a game) that these "gripes" are about something much deeper than pickup tone charts.

Yeah, you're right. There's no point in discussing anything that requires some degree of brainpower or consideration. Maybe you'll be happier on some beer-drinkers forum... Oh, on second thought, there's actually some science behind beer making so maybe that's not such a good idea. To you, discussing ideas are "gripes," but to people who like to discuss different topics, it's just another thing to think about and discuss. Why don't you stop trying to criticize people when you don't like their topic. You can always choose not to participate and go find one of those stupid threads in off-topic that have zero substance for anyone with brain.

WTF happened here?

Some of you really should get off the internet and go play guitar or something. Does anyone honestly even look at those charts or read the description? Thankfully I have a pretty good idea of what I like, but the drawer full of pickups is how I got here. I can tell you NONE of the videos or “tone samples” had any influence because what matters is how it sounds thru my rig with me playing.

Cool then maybe you can share some of your audio tracks with us. I play a LOT, but there's only so much your hands (and ears) can take.
 
Last edited:
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

I agree with Ayrton and LLL with this.

When I mentioned frequency estimate for B(LM)M(MH)H chart, I only meant random estimate what whoever makes the graph means by it. Nothing scientific.

I can say that when I speak about low mids, I mean frequencies around 120-250 hz, those give that give the thumping and tight bass. Someone else might put them straight into what I see as mids: around 500 hz.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

I agree with Ayrton and LLL with this.

When I mentioned frequency estimate for B(LM)M(MH)H chart, I only meant random estimate what whoever makes the graph means by it. Nothing scientific.

I can say that when I speak about low mids, I mean frequencies around 120-250 hz, those give that give the thumping and tight bass. Someone else might put them straight into what I see as mids: around 500 hz.

I disagree with your agreement, he he, but having an accurate frequency chart would should show that. Check out Eminence speakers website. They have a PDF that youc an download which tells you the low end shape, midrange character, high end, and a pretty good description of each. If speaker makers and other pickup manufacturers provide this info, then what's to disagree with asking Seymour Duncan to do a better job of it? You should consider that there are a lot of people who aren't like "Screw it, whatever man. Just do it." A lot of us like to think things through, plan, and have at least a good idea of what we're trying to accomplish. There seems to be an aversion to things that require much thought when it comes to naysayers.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

You can sweep different speakers with frequencies using the same sound generator source and get comparable frequency response charts. Can't do that with guitar pickups.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

The crazy thing was that apparently Seymour Duncan paid inside or outside help to create that big, strange list of mV output values. It would have been a lot quicker and presumably cheaper if they simply bought a $100 LCR meter , set the thing to 100Hz in SER mode, connect the leads of the pickup to the meter and let us know what the meter says. It seems to me that they just looked at DiMarzio's site, and said, they have this "output" crap, we should have some "output" crap, too. Enough with the crap, just give is actual electrical values that mean something.

That being said, yes, a pickup also sounds different when you change the magnet out. In that case, there is a change that is not necessarily expressed by inductance, nor an impedance plot (but technically it manifests in those values also), this difference is not expressed as an frequency response difference, rather it's a time based difference, it changes the "pick attack" and even how the string vibrates as the energy decays. Of course you get those sorts of differences by raising and lowering the pickup as well. The good news though is that there are only a few magnets typically used, AlNiCo 2/3/4, AlNiCo 5 and ceramic, and more good news, you can swap them out in most cases and they're cheap, and more good news you can also just raise or lower pickups and get similar characteristics without even changing the magnet. Compared to that limited dimension, the variation in terms of inductance is far more vast. You might have a pickup with an inductance of 2.2, or 4.7, or 8.8, or 5.3, all sorts of crazy inductances, and the inductance is not something you easily change, like a bar magnet. It's the most "fixed" parameter of a pickup.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

You can sweep different speakers with frequencies using the same sound generator source and get comparable frequency response charts. Can't do that with guitar pickups.

Agreed. Speakers are at the end of the chain and as such can be measured fairly accurately for comparison. The frequency response of pickups, being at the beginning, can be affected by too many things having to do with the guitar itself (wood, electronics, distance from the strings, distance from the neck, etc.). All of these things can certainly be measured accurately but the problem is that CHOOSING what environmental factors to use for the comparison is little more than an educated guess and therefore arbitrary.

To just give straight electrical values and physical specs doesn’t really help most people... myself included. There are so many variables that go into pickup construction (magnet type, size and type of wire, number of turns, size and type of pole pieces) that it’s VERY difficult for the average buyer to separate them and see the big picture of how they all come together to sound. For most of us all we can do is listen to the samples, scour the internet for demos, and cross our fingers. Let’s face it... the only way we’re REALLY going to find out what that pickup sounds like is to put it in OUR guitar and run it through OUR rig.

To the OP... It’s certainly nothing to get upset about. You asked and he answered. I wish I worked for Seymour Duncan because I would happily and sincerely apologize to you on their behalf for not presenting the information in a format that pleases you.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

Ok, I’m closing this before we get to point where infractions are dished out.
 
Re: Why Doesn't Seymour Duncan Fix The Custom Custom SH-11 EQ Chart?

You've never heard of The Great Tone Quest? The quest that seemingly goes on forever and ever? Maybe that amp will scratch the itch. Maybe that pickup will give me Stevie's tone. Frankly, the existence of this forum is a testament to the endlessness of the pursuit. And you're a moderator of the forum, seemingly with more dedication than anyone. We should take a pole as to the most number of pickup swaps anyone has done to any one guitar.
Actually, that isn't my experience. I found my sound fairly easily, and don't tinker with gear that much these days, preferring to spend more time writing and playing. Now, while that is vastly different than some people's path, there are a lot of people like me. I don't like to spend time or mental energy obsessing about gear anymore. I like gear, but it isn't why I play guitar. Talking to tens of thousands of other players, when it comes to pickups, by now I have a pretty good idea what most people need to make a decision. Good descriptions and recommendations go a lot further than graphs that most guitarists won't understand. I am all for more and helpful info, however, and if we can think of better ways to help the customer make a decision, I am all for it. Then, of course, we have to make a decision about what we would like and what is possible, and what would confuse the average customer (not you or I) even more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top