So, talking to AI about pickups...

Every time I look at an AI summary for research, I realize how profoundly incorrect a lot of it is. Yet people are taking this obviously incorrect information and treating it it like gospel, because some computer puked it out.

We are well and truly F'd if that becomes the norm.
 
Every time I look at an AI summary for research, I realize how profoundly incorrect a lot of it is. Yet people are taking this obviously incorrect information and treating it it like gospel, because some computer puked it out.

We are well and truly F'd if that becomes the norm.
Exactly!

Ive been messing around with chatgpt to see how much it knows of what I know to be true.
Ive see the dimarzio at1 and tone zone described as bright and bassy at the same time. So, they're scooped? A little ways down, they have smooth and increased mid range.
Change the wording of the question often leads to vastly different descriptions.

The air norton is not good for leads because its not bright. Lol.


Darth Phineas has been getting alot of references for chatgpt. He should sue and monetize!

Apparently, AI is now screwing up Thanksgiving recipes. People need to get a freaking clue.
 
Darth Phineas has been getting alot of references for chatgpt. He should sue and monetize!

Yeah, these LLMs are trained to plagiarize and infringe on IP as a feature. You shouldn't just be able to opt out of having your works used for AI training, you should have to opt in and get paid for the indignity. But now basically every soc med platform is adding verbiage to their terms and conditions that using their platform entitles them to feed your info and everything you post to these slimy tech grifters. The longer we go without guardrails, the harder it will be to add them without the crocodile teared cries of "killing innovation" or some such rhetoric drivel
 
Started using the AI do jour to take meeting notes at work and the result isn't too bad, but some of the content is blatantly incorrect so I don't see yet what are the exact benefits of taking these notes without vetting them thoroughly and correcting the factually incorrect content before storing the result for posterity (or whatever data retention period we have to comply with). Imagine someone who wasn't in that meeting go over those factually incorrect notes not in 2 years, but in 2 months.
 
Yeah, these LLMs are trained to plagiarize and infringe on IP as a feature. You shouldn't just be able to opt out of having your works used for AI training, you should have to opt in and get paid for the indignity. But now basically every soc med platform is adding verbiage to their terms and conditions that using their platform entitles them to feed your info and everything you post to these slimy tech grifters. The longer we go without guardrails, the harder it will be to add them without the crocodile teared cries of "killing innovation" or some such rhetoric drivel
Exactly.

I've seen my own forum words from 10 years ago pop up

THEY make the money on US, or you guys rather.
Aside from forums, I have a very small social footprint.

I run ad blockers on everything.
 
None of the current AI clowns respect it. Smaller sites are getting hammered into oblivion.
All the big ones do. OpenAI, Google, Claude, etc..

It's the little guys you've got to worry about, although I'm sure hosting sites are working on AI "firewalls" to limit the scrapers that ignore it
 
Back
Top