King IzzO)))
Ultimate Kitten Puncher
Re: Why Aren't there More Female Guitar Players, Especially Electric?
Never heard them before, I'm checking this out later.
Never heard them before, I'm checking this out later.
And no I don't believe you would let your boy play with Barbie or wear pink socks to school.
The older brother of the current Forum Pet:?:Some of you need to stop trying to make this about you.
I thought verbo was banned fo life?
If they want to play guitar, they will.
As I said before, they're told it's a boy thing right from the beginning. There are kids in my son's pre-school that are already preaching that and then I meet their parents and find out where it's from.Fine, I'll give you that. The question I'm asking is why don't they (in significant numbers)?
Firstly, Richard - you don't know what you're talking about.
Fine, I'll give you that. The question I'm asking is why don't they (in significant numbers)?
This entire topic is a waste of time. If they want to play guitar, they will.
Creating some false quota to make yourself feel better does nothing to promote equality. Instead, it promotes the notion that they are incapable of making without your specially designed consideration that accommodates YOUR perceived deficits in them.
I call :bsflag:As I said before, they're told it's a boy thing right from the beginning. There are kids in my son's pre-school that are already preaching that and then I meet their parents and find out where it's from.
We need to keep our kids free of that BS right from the beginning.
Sent from my Moto X 2014 using Tapatalk
What about biology? In my experience, women are less passionate about the creation of music. Sure, they love to hear it, sing along, dance, whatever. But on average, they are not as interested in composition. Perhaps in the beginning, songs were part of courtship. And all throughout nature, most courtship involves the male persuing the female.
Look at any guitar magazine. Or the local salesman at the big box music retailer. Or the list of artists on a manufacturers website. Or the way many guys act on music forums. No wonder they stay away.
Can't make a horse drink water. If women wanted to play guitar, they by all means will. If they don't want to, there's no need to engage on some massive social engineering project to try to squeeze more females into the mix.
I thought we're supposed to avoid political discussions on here? Title XI is a very shaky piece of legislature, and it's the exact type of thing rock n roll doesn't need. It means well but reeks of Big Brother. Creating a machine to try to equalize things would be a massive step back from the free rolling music landscape created by rock, where anyone can try to make it. Imagine if record companies had to have equal representation among signed acts, 50% men and 50% women? How would SD work if you guys had to add women to equal the amount of men you endorse? That's true equality, if you dip over on one side or the other then you're skewed to favor that side. We could go on for days about what groups are over or under represented, but simple numbers won't make the world any better. I know a few female players, do I support them? Of course I do. Do I go around encouraging everyone to start playing? Not unless they ask. I'm not a Jehovah's Witness, and I'd hope SD would be cool enough to avoid becoming like that. The world is also different that 40 years ago, I'm sure the tumblristas would make up their own mind on if they want to play guitar. And they'll be better for deciding it on their own rather than it being crammed down their throats as cool.That's all true.
But look at the world of sports. It used to be the same--pretty much all male. But not anymore. Women are big in school sports and pro sports, especially soccer, basketball, volleyball, softball, golf, tennis, etc. Of course, they had a little help from the United States Government 40+ years ago with Title IX.
Is Title IX "social engineering?" Perhaps in the '60s and '70s, folks were saying, "If women wanted to play sports, then by all means, they will." But they didn't until Title IX kicked in. Now I don't know what an analogous program for guitar would look like or even if such a thing is possible--so please keep this in mind before flaming me for suggesting something I didn't suggest.
But I'm asking you to consider this. If Title IX got girls and women to participate in sports to a much higher degree than when they were left to their own devices dictated by societal norms and expectations--is it unreasonable to suggest that similar programs could be created and adopted that would encourage more females to play guitar?
Read the OP. The tech industry is dealing with the same issues and is putting money behind it. Is music-making any different?
That's all true.
But look at the world of sports. It used to be the same--pretty much all male. But not anymore. Women are big in school sports and pro sports, especially soccer, basketball, volleyball, softball, golf, tennis, etc. Of course, they had a little help from the United States Government 40+ years ago with Title IX.